- Mar 20, 2013
- 551
- 186
- 241
This entire thread has been an excellent example to illustrate the frustration that ensues when someone tries presenting facts to disagree with a person whose arguments are based on personal beliefs -- i.e. an objective argument against a subjective one. It reminds me of when I tried asking why peafowl breeders didn't try to combine colors, which was answered by repeating the dogma that it wasn't possible. It reminds me of posts here that in any way mention evolution, which draw responses from people who refuse to acknowledge that it occurs because they personally prefer the creation explanation. In this case, we have a young man who has decided that his pea named Thor is a male, and a lot of people who disagree. Like the other topics, this isn't a debate to be won by the "most convincing" argument -- the truth will present itself in due time, regardless of what he or everyone else thinks. I don't agree with his conclusion, but I know that his conclusion is not likely to be swayed by the opinions of others, and he's determined to prove others wrong. Well, that's a healthy attitude when "the opinions of others" say he won't succeed in a task, but not for something like identifying the sex of a dimorphic species of bird. However, egging him on will just make him frustrated. When Thor has reached the age of having 100% adult plumage, the truth won't be able to be hidden.

