Quote:
Your opinion alice ...
proof???? This is a forum, not a scientific study.
I don't think the thread is derailing, and find the information quite interesting. The BYC forum has many threads that do get side-tracked from time to time. Most don't find that to be a problem.
In this case, I find aveca's information quite informative and interesting, and asked her to continue posting. You should be mindful of that, and just skip over the posts you don't want to read or don't care about. You don't need to comment about them or decide if the post is, "on topic." Just pass by them ....
Thanks! Nothing like getting slapped for thinking something is so over the top great.
Ive said at least three times Im not looking to be correct, Just pointing out something, just a possiblibty nothing more... from someone (me) who loves to study prehistory and it jumped right out at me.
There are people out there trying with everything they have to string peices of DNA together to get a glimpse at what an extinct animal looked like and somehow it might and Im going to say again M I G H T have occured by accident in somones back yard.
If you think they are just terrible, then keep them as pets and dont do anything more and stop breeding.. I personnaly think they are great ..and someone might even take it to a bigger level and get them back to the origional blue feather described by the scientists above . I put the book name in here somewhere most versions are spanish so finding more on the reading has been tough the history of the pacific
And someone said its way off topic, no it isnt really the opening page says whats wrong with thier feathers? alice propsed something I proposed something else.