- Thread starter
- #61
Chickenosauurs_RexNo54
Songster
okBy keeping silkiexnaked neck crosses and breeding them. They're just naked necks with silkie feathering. Really nit that hard to do in a mixed flock in a few genrrations
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
okBy keeping silkiexnaked neck crosses and breeding them. They're just naked necks with silkie feathering. Really nit that hard to do in a mixed flock in a few genrrations
They also seem to be fragile no matter what you do. This has caused some speculation that the silkie mutation in Ameraucanas is connected to or is a lethal gene, kinda-of like how 2 frizzle genes creates a frazzle chicken with problems
Sorry for your hen. That is what I meant when I said the silkied Ameraucanas were fragile. They just seem to kick the bucket when they feel like it. That is at least what I have read.It's not that.
We had a Silkied Ameraucana hen, Happy, back in "the day".
She survived some rather awful incubation conditions that make me wince now.
A really wonderful hen, she laid every day. At about a year and a half she passed away suddenly for no discernible reason except that it was summer in Florida.
There's not much on an Ameraucana to dissipate heat, no big comb, but my smooth feathered ones do fine in the heat.
Too, breeds have different amounts of underfluff which could be affecting insulation, and then there's skin color to consider.
I ran into a curious thing with the Genetic Hackle I got from Dennis, they don't enjoy the cold at all, they have very little underfluff. But on the super-hot days they were in heaven sunning themselves for hours with their hackle feathers flared out, while other breeds were panting and burying themselves in the shade.
In fact, I don't think I've ever seen one pant.
I've actually thought about making a silkied English Orpington, but the English Orpington I have already needs special care in the heat, so they would only really be suited for Antarctica.
I know that feelingI wish my energy, time and space could keep up with my fantastic mental ambitions . . .
I will weigh in here regarding the Silkied Ameraucanas. There is an extensive amount of info on this site about their history. I bought eggs and chicks and it took me a few years to establish them in my pens. I did repetitive outcrosses to standard bred, high quality black and lavender Ams (my original stock from John Blehm). That was so extensive that even when I stopped deliberately breeding for silkied, the gene still exists in some of my flock.
I sent lavender Ameraucanas to Sand Hill Preservation Center, and warned him that the silkied gene popped up from time to time. IDK if he actually had that happen, or if he was just passing along my information in his description. I know he likes that like of Lavenders and finally felt an Ameraucana was laying eggs he could call blue instead of green. Honestly, John Blehm should have the credit for those nice blue eggs. I continue to select for that, but it's easy when you start with excellent stock. I would not count on being able to recover the silkied gene from his lavender Ameraucanas.
Last summer I had 2 silkied chicks pop up in my brooders. Both perished quickly, but I have tried to put the old band back together again and have resolved to not sell Ameraucana chicks until they are a week old, so I can inspect for silkied feathers. This pen produces Sexlinked Ameraucanas in Black and Lavender, and the head spot on the lavenders is sometimes hard to see, so I like to wait until I see primary feathers I can inspect for barring. Of course, any silkied chicks will be put into brooders with more gentle chicks, like the genetic hackles, cochin bantams, etc. - and not with their fellow Ameraucanas or Ayam cemani, both of which I suspect of evil acts when I have left the room.
Someone mentioned that the reason they disappeared is because they were only kept by "fad breeders". That is just not true. I distributed literally hundreds of silkied and silkied split chicks to other breeders around the country (and I did not get rich doing this, I don't believe in extorting money for rare breeds, I'd rather see them get common). Some of them could still have them, as I have no way to follow up. Several reported problems keeping them alive and that was when I decided they were not worth my time to preserve anymore. I made sure to send some to mild climate areas, like FL and CA.
I had no problems producing lots of silkied chicks by using a silkied roo over split hens. Half the resulting chicks were silkied and the rest were splits, all good breeding material. I had trouble with the pullets and hens dying over the sometimes harsh winters here in PA. I also was not vaccinating for Marek's at the time and many of my losses were " Marek's suspicious". I hope to recover the gene this year and with vaccinated chicks, to try again. If I am outrageously successful, I might have a few chicks to share with a fellow breeder or 2, but most likely I will use the chicks to re-establish the pens I had, and put a few in the care of a friend who has "cushier" overwintering facilities than I can obtain at the working farm where my birds are housed. As I think about it, she will likely get most of the silkied pullets, and I will focus on some silkied and single barred cockerels to see if I can make silkied cuckoo Ams. I wish my energy, time and space could keep up with my fantastic mental ambitions . . .
At my new place, I hope to work on silkied pheonixes. They won't ever be show worthy, but I hope they will still be impressive
Oh they most definitely will!