- May 8, 2008
- 224
- 6
- 144
If I had had to shoot someones pet, I think the way I'd go about telling them was having the sherriff delivering the citation for animal at large and a bill for the damage caused. Here you get to collect a fee from the owner as well, it's only a few dollars. In modern society, with so many people being very self centered, I think pursuing your rights is just asking for retaliation. SSS makes sense in that it protects my animals, all of my neighbors animals, and perhaps some idiot that tries to retaliate. I'd hate to see having to kill to defend my animals turn into having to kill to defend myself or my children. I build a strong coop to keep from having to resort to harming others animals.
On another note...
There is no way to track a downed animal, especially one thats buried, with a microchip. Once found by some other method it could be identified with it though. A transmitter small enough to be placed on a bird would either have very limited wattage or a very short lifespan due to the size of battery that a bird could carry. So, they would have to be in close proximity to the transmitter to find it, or they would have to be tracking the bird in the first day or two after release. A weak transmitter would be severely reduced in range even a few inches underground. It is very improbable that any killed bird has ever been tracked by a transmitter in its body because the poor efficacy of the wearable device would not make it cost effective to have been implemented in the first place.
On another note...
There is no way to track a downed animal, especially one thats buried, with a microchip. Once found by some other method it could be identified with it though. A transmitter small enough to be placed on a bird would either have very limited wattage or a very short lifespan due to the size of battery that a bird could carry. So, they would have to be in close proximity to the transmitter to find it, or they would have to be tracking the bird in the first day or two after release. A weak transmitter would be severely reduced in range even a few inches underground. It is very improbable that any killed bird has ever been tracked by a transmitter in its body because the poor efficacy of the wearable device would not make it cost effective to have been implemented in the first place.