Quote:
Yeah, I saw it and commented. Some people will always believe that the right of their dog to run free and be a predator takes precedent over another animals right to exist. That is the problem with my neighbors. They think it's cruel to confine a dog and not "let it be a dog." But they think it is just unfortunate (not cruel on their part) when the dogs torment and kill.
A while ago i wrote a thread about my neighbor and her problem with letting her dogs be wild and free. The last time i caught her dog in my yard, it was terrorizing my birds. A few weeks ago, I went out to do the morning chores, and I found one of my quail missing it's head.
My neighbor knows her dogs are not welcome here, and I told her if this continues, her dogs will not come home . In our town, it is not illeagle to shoot a dog (or other)in defense of life or property. The rule is you have to talk to the offender first. tell them that their dog had been a problem. i did that, and she knows it.
she thinks it's cruel to tie them up, and keep them in their own yard, but don't understand that it's seems even crueler to let them do as they please, and then get shot for doing as they please.
the police in your area are impressive. When I called our police, they told me the rule about shooting them. (we are outside city limits) These problem dogs have a past, so hopefully they will be taken care of. So what is the owner think about the dogs if they were to attack a small child? Maybe since the dogs have a violent past, it'll make it easier for the police to realize that they might move on to bigger prey, and a decision to prevent the dogs from harming anything and anyone again. It has happened in my neighborhood (packing dogs seriously injured a little boy, and almost killed him.) but that was years ago before we moved here, and it was because of that little boy that the shooting rule came to play.
I'm so sorry about your birds. Irresponsible people really chap my hide!!