I agree.I've got a solution for the EE/Ameracauna problem. Maybe 1/2 breeds are EE, and full-breed/not standard should just be called "Ameracauna-not standard" or something![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree.I've got a solution for the EE/Ameracauna problem. Maybe 1/2 breeds are EE, and full-breed/not standard should just be called "Ameracauna-not standard" or something![]()
why complicate things? It either is or isn't. There is already too much confusion. If one understands the difference, they should be doing what they can to educate those that don't have a grasp of the ameraucana/EE debate. Follow the lead of the ABC.I've got a solution for the EE/Ameracauna problem. Maybe 1/2 breeds are EE, and full-breed/not standard should just be called "Ameracauna-not standard" or something![]()
One thing I find bizarre in the Ameraucana breed is that they only have to breed true > 50% of the time to be considered "pure". That means nearly half the offspring for a pair of "pure" Ameraucanas can turn out to be EEs. Sounds to me like the gene pool is pretty polluted if they don't breed true all, or almost all, of the time. Is this the case for other breeds of chickens? Do Black Australorps, Barred Rocks, RIRs, etc etc etc only breed true ~50%??
Thanks for the clarification. Guess I've only seen it related to Ameraucanas since there is that whole "hatchery Ameraucana" thing that I researched after I ordered my 2 from Ideal in 2012 and then learned here that there are Ameraucanas and there are EEs and they aren't the same.
Maybe Ravyn can explain again where the confusion comes from. She can explain it much better than I can, because she has been dealing with them for much longer, but it was something along the lines of EEs were Ameraucanas before the APA set guidelines for the breed. I know that doesn't make sense, but she knows what I'm saying