Anyone come across this?

You are correct. This is why it is not recommmended to use white legorns for red sexlinks, though they were used originally. That is why I said "original". The dominant white genetics confuses things. Now most hatcheries use rhode island whites or white rocks as the white parent. 😊
Most red sex links have dominant white. It’s what’s under the dominant white that determines if the sex-linking works.
 
Most red sex links have dominant white. It’s what’s under the dominant white that determines if the sex-linking works.
I thought it was silver versus gold genetics that created the sex link.šŸ¤”
From what I have read most red sexlinks are now made with white rocks or white Rhode Island Reds which are both recessive whites.
 
I thought it was silver versus gold genetics that created the sex link.šŸ¤”
From what I have read most sexlinks are now used with white rocks or white Rhode Island Reds which are both recessive whites.
Silver and gold are used to make red sex links. However, many of them also have dominant white. That’s why red sex link hens have white tail and neck feathers.
 
Silver and gold are used to make red sex links. However, many of them also have dominant white. That’s why red sex link hens have white tail and neck feathers.
Well only the ones that are made with white leghorns right? Because the other white birds used in Red sex links are recessive white.
 
They must be specific strains that have dominant white too. I’ve never seen a red sex link hen without dominant white (except for ones that used SLWs in the cross).
Yes, I know that some of the ā€œsecret recipesā€œ that many hatcheries use for their sex links can be several generations using several different breeds.😊
 
They must be specific strains that have dominant white too. I’ve never seen a red sex link hen without dominant white (except for ones that used SLWs in the cross).
If they were dominant white though wouldn’t it be a mostly white bird with either red or black flex like with an australorp?
 
@Amer and/or @The Moonshiner and/or @NatJ any genetic explanation on why red sexlinks using recessive white birds have white under feathering? In my research I read that white leghorns should not be used when making red sex links as the dominant white confuses things.šŸ¤”
 
Red sex links do have dominate white. That's why they have white.
Dominate white has little or no effect on gold tones such as buff or red.
Where does the dominant white come from? When I read up on red sex links they primarily talk about white rocks or Rhode Island Whites?
 
Last edited:

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom