I'm trying to update quite a number of sites, almost 50, that are involved in some capacity with the Canadian Right to Food Trial and appeal.
I hope to post something soon and I am just awaiting the response from a legal organization that is considering taking on the file.
Quickly, this is the latest:
Appeal filed.
Transcripts requested @ $3400CDN... (yikes)
If you happen to have read the decision, the very 1st item I submitted as evidence was my T5007 Income Statement. It is an official document from the Province of Alberta. It states I make a total of $12,499.00 annually. That is what my 10 year old son and I live on in a year. The judge stated that I was not able to prove financial burden. I am well below the LICO (Low Income Cut Off) and after Rent and Utilities, my son and I have about $280/month to live on. I am not sure what more she wanted me to prove, but based on the fact her and her husband, who is Alberta Chief Justice neil Wittmann, receive over $700,000/year as judges, my financial capacity is beyond her capacity and experience to comprehend. I also stated that eggs were a significant part of our protein diet, as we avoid most meats. Our hens were providing us with 6 eggs daily, for aprox 320 days a year. Organic eggs in Calgary are $7/dozen. So everyday our girls saved us $3.50. So, just our hens saved us over $1000 year, which represents over 25% of my annual food budget. Again, this is completely outside of her experience and context. As well, it was 1 of aprox 60 items introduced during the trial and not the only item we are appealing. She really missed a lot, but the Court of Queen's Bench appeal will correct the oversight on her part.
Hope this provides some clarity.
We also have an online auction going on over at CLUCK Canada to help raise funds for the trial.
http://www.facebook.com/groups/CLUCKCANADA &
http://cluck4.wix.com/cluck-trial-fund#!menu/c21ei
I can be reached at c403.383.3420
Paul Hughes
ps I never thought my backyard looked like a dump. There was a garden, patio, a little pond, we painted the coop, a berry bush, a composter, it was essentially an urban farm and it was open for all to see and not behind a fence (part of the 2(b) argument), but it was beside some manicured lawns and that juxtaposition doesn't always work for the urbanites. Not clinical enough perhaps, but very practical and functional.