**Casey Anthony Verdict In ..**

[welsummerchicks]

The comment about the child being better off dead is just another example of how people can twist and distort religion to their own purposes and agendas.

What's even more disturbing, is that it's entirely possible for someone to decide to act on such a belief.

 

[HarlansHollowFarms]

Quote:
I am in no way religious, but to justify anyone being murdered is unbelievable. No gods involved.
I will not judge the poster, but I do not agree, by any means.

 

[turney31]

Quote:
Thank you and AMEN!

 

[WickedNerd]

Quote:
I'm with you 100%. Unfortunately, justice isn't always served in this country, but I think it's done the best way we can sometimes. I really do think the Casey woman is guilty, but there wasn't even evidence to support. If people had been patient and done their jobs thoroughly, maybe there would have been a conviction we all would agree with. The jury went with what they had to work with.

As for the idea that someone can justify a death based on the face that Casey was allegedly not a Christian...I find that so completely ridiculous I don't even know where to begin. No one deserves what that poor little girl suffered through, period. I've seen wonderful Christian parents and I've seen some of the biggest hypocrites to the religion as well. Buddhists, Wiccans, Muslims, Hebrews, Shintoists, Hindu, Red Path Followers (don't know the proper name for it), Agnostics, and Atheists alike can be fantastic parents and they can be horrible ones too. It doesn't matter what faith you follow or even if you follow one at all. I think the most important thing we can instill in our youth is to respect humanity and life, however you decide to manage to teach that value. Casey doesn't seem to have that value, guilty or not. Regardless, though, if she didn't want to bear that responsibility, she should have given that poor child up for adoption so that she could have been with a loving family that did.

 

[turney31]

Quote:

 

[chickened]

This all sounds plausible if she is truly guilty if she is a victim of an over zealous DA than the opposite would be true. We will never really know unless she does an O.J. stunt.
The judges in our courts get to decide what evidence the jurors have access to and with that being the unknown at this time it is hard to fault the jury or the D.A.

I have been to court a time or two to collect money from deadbeats that would not pay me and it was an eye opener to me for sure. Defense lawyers have ways of turning an open and shut case to enough doubt in a jurors mind but it is a little more difficult to do it to a judge. I am still out on her being guilty or not.
Quote:
However, any lawyer will ALSO tell you, the WORST client is the 'bad woman' - the indifferent, arrogant, 'emotionless, having fun after the crime and blaming others' type. They very often do get the death penalty or get convicted of the more serious charge.

Then, single, white, young and pretty don't mean nothin'. In fact for the 'bad woman', 'single, white, young, pretty' makes it all the worse.

The other possibility of course, is that she was kicking up her heels after the death so much because:

1.) She knew something and was going to hold it over someone for the rest of their life
2.) She thought it would make her less guilty looking
3.) She normally acts that way and didn't want to change any of her habits, in hopes of continuing to conceal the death of the child, on her behalf or on the behalf of someone else, who as long as they were not in jail, was going to be her cash cow for the rest of her life
4.) The person who was responsible for the death, told her to
5.) She WAS s. abused as a child, and has abnormal responses to situations as a result
6.) The persons involved in the death, felt sure that they had come up with an airtight plan that would keep them out of suspicion. You know, like, the mother calling up the police in a panic, the husband with his suicide attempt, the daughter with her insistence that the nanny took the child - and all that.
7.) Whoever is responsible told Casey to act that way, with the hopes that if their plan DID fall apart, attention would shift from that person - right to Casey.

My own feeling is that the mother, the father and Casey were all complicit in concealing a death which was to one degree or another, accidental.

And that the problem with the case, and the REASON for the lack of evidence sufficient for a conviction on any of the more serious charges, is that the authorities couldn't get any of them to turn on each other.

WHY couldn't the authorities get anyone of them to turn on each other? Because one of the parents, someone with a strong will, and good at deception, had a material role in the plan to conceal the death, and was highly motivated to keep the facts from not coming out.

In a crime where the facts cannot be discovered, it is almost ALWAYS true that all or some of the most closely involved people, are working together to conceal the facts.

 

[chickened]

You are right,(ow! that hurt) the job here is to PROVE she did it not to prove everyone thinks she did it as ridiculous as that sounds it is very important to see that distinction as it often gets overlooked, you would be glad that is the case if you were innocent and on trial. The defense only need prove reasonable doubt not in any way she is not the murderer.
Quote:

 

[backdoorchicken]

seeing as i don't drink alcohol i am really enjoying this new casey anthony mixed drink.

















































it's zero proof.

 

[cassie]

My own feeling is that the mother, the father and Casey were all complicit in concealing a death which was to one degree or another, accidental.

There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that anyone but Casey had anything to do with Caylee's death. None whatever. Her parents' biggest crime was in standing behind their daughter. And that is certainly understandable. No one wants to believe their own child is a cold blooded murderer.

For the sake of argument, if the death was indeed accidental someone would have called 911. And more importantly there would NOT have been duct tape on Caylee's nose and mouth.

I'll shut up now.

 

[welsummerchicks]

There is also no evidence Casey Anthony did it. Which was my real point.

if the death was indeed accidental someone would have called 911. And more importantly there would NOT have been duct tape on Caylee's nose and mouth

Where's the proof of cause of death, time and date of death, and location of death? Without that, the case has no foundation.