Quote:
A lot of economists and historians have argued that FDR's policies EXTENDED the effects of the depression by at least two years. You can call this "re-writing" history if you like, but some view it as looking back and learning from your mistakes.
I was in favor of some limited, short-term government intervention to stem the worst of the bleeding and avert panic. I'm not in favor of long-term trending towards socialism.
Keynsian economics has been out of favor for decades, and government spending is not the long-term answer to restoring growth and productivity.
Recessions generally last 12 months. Bad ones last somewhat longer. Tack on some extra time because of the mess the world financial system was in, and we should still be seeing signs of recovery starting in September. Expect 4-6 months more for the job market to improve.
If all the above is on target, then "cash for clunkers" getting some troubled industries through a slow summer, and ending right before September was a good move.
Businesses over-spend like drunken sailors during boom economies, expecting them to never end. Businesses over-react with cuts during down economies, expecting things will only get worse. The recession was worsened by panic in the business sector, and government reassurances helped deflect that ... when they were done right.
Cash for Clunkers was sort of like giving your kid $200 for an unexpected car repair so they don't lose their job because they can't get to work. Sometimes a little safety net in tough times is a good thing. However, some of Obama's policies seem to be headed towards giving your kid a car, making the down-payment on their house, and then helping them with their bills until they're 40. That's just plain stupid. I don't want to see the US turned into a huge welfare state. I've seen what happened to England, and it's not pretty.