It sounded like its efficacy was more about keeping the virus from advancing to severe so keeping people out of ICU and the morgue
Right, but better protection is better. It's better than no shot so people should get it! But we probably don't have a lot of data about immune compromised people for example who might not produce as much of an immune response or people with serious lung issues, or people with kids who can't get vaccinated, so that extra 33% prevention is better and helps reach herd immunity faster too even in ordinary folks.
But again, it's a good thing to have. I'm all for more tools in the toolbox.
I think it's kinda funny that they went the same route as the mRNA vaccine with targeting the spike though. It makes sense, though. It's the best spot to target. It does the same thing as the mRNA vaccine to some degree. Just differently.