wood&feathers :
OK we kicked off this thread with a great discussion of the advantages of Cubalayas for homesteading. Given the importance of keeping a clean run, I am starting to think I am seeing something - feel free to tell me I am "full of it"...
Are Cubalaya poops more compact and small per pound of bird? I have a small Easter Egger hen who is the same size as the Cuba pullets I bought from a certain Virginia gentleman. Her poop is 2x as big as the cubas, and 8x more smelly. My production reds aren't much bigger. But the POOP! My old layer flock all have huge smelly poo. But these cubalayas poo is much smaller and more like that of a wild turkey - dry and not very smelly. Would their feed efficiency be reflected in waste output?
I guess it could make sense. Cornish x's are at the other end of the scale - a highly hybridized result of selective breeding for fattening. The cubalayas, being derived from games, may have a more "wild" digestive tract?
Any ideas or am I hallucinating in the compost pile??
I can't really speak for their feed efficiency, I'd guess it's actually not all that good. A cornish cross has great feed efficiency, the way I see it, it's simple,- more goes in, more comes out!!!
I do see my cubas have smaller waste than the larger breeds I have, but, I always figured it was just size. As in, smaller body, = smaller dump. They also are more active foragers, they eat more fibrous foods, which produces a healthier, firmer pellet in my experience. I do see your point, they are a "cleaner" breed if you will than the larger ones, sure.