Quote:
Sadly, this happens waaaaay more often than it should. I have one such story where an ancestor is listed with a middle initial in a single census. A researcher who believes his ancestor to be the son of this man (not yet proven and no data to prove it other than a similar name and year of birth) had been told that HIS ancestor had a middle name that starts with the same letter as the middle initial of MY ancestor who would be the father of his ancestor if proven. This researcher then published a tree connecting his ancestor to mine and then gave MY ancestor the same middle name as he believed his ancestor had. The problem with all of this goes well beyond the fact that his ancestor isn't yet proven to this guy, but that the middle name he assigned for my ancestor exists for HIS ancestor only in a story passed down from an aunt. Actual records give his ancestor a totally different middle name. Plus, he also tried to change the spelling of HIS ancestor's name to match the spelling of MY ancestor's name.
And, that tree is out there for someone to take as fact and attach to their trees.
Quote:
And, even those can be incorrect. Your best research is research that can be proven by more than one source. In pre-drivers license/Social Security days, people didn't keep as good of records as they do now. Ages change from one census to the next. Spellings change from one record to the next. Secondary sources (like death certificates giving a date of birth) aren't as good of a source for that than a birth or christening record might be.
And, people lied. For various reasons, people changed their ages, places of birth, etc. The challenge is to sort the fact from the fiction.
Quote:
Some of my most fun comes from tracking the side lines. They really help to fill out the family story. And, it's a ton of fun meeting the new family gained by working together to trace our shared lines.
Sadly, this happens waaaaay more often than it should. I have one such story where an ancestor is listed with a middle initial in a single census. A researcher who believes his ancestor to be the son of this man (not yet proven and no data to prove it other than a similar name and year of birth) had been told that HIS ancestor had a middle name that starts with the same letter as the middle initial of MY ancestor who would be the father of his ancestor if proven. This researcher then published a tree connecting his ancestor to mine and then gave MY ancestor the same middle name as he believed his ancestor had. The problem with all of this goes well beyond the fact that his ancestor isn't yet proven to this guy, but that the middle name he assigned for my ancestor exists for HIS ancestor only in a story passed down from an aunt. Actual records give his ancestor a totally different middle name. Plus, he also tried to change the spelling of HIS ancestor's name to match the spelling of MY ancestor's name.
And, that tree is out there for someone to take as fact and attach to their trees.
Quote:
And, even those can be incorrect. Your best research is research that can be proven by more than one source. In pre-drivers license/Social Security days, people didn't keep as good of records as they do now. Ages change from one census to the next. Spellings change from one record to the next. Secondary sources (like death certificates giving a date of birth) aren't as good of a source for that than a birth or christening record might be.
And, people lied. For various reasons, people changed their ages, places of birth, etc. The challenge is to sort the fact from the fiction.
Quote:
Some of my most fun comes from tracking the side lines. They really help to fill out the family story. And, it's a ton of fun meeting the new family gained by working together to trace our shared lines.