Quote:
It depends on the term "Lavender" and the person you ask. To me no, you can not have a "Lavender" mottled fowl.
"Lavender" is what's known as Self Blue, Self Color by APA definition is: A single uniform color throughout the plumage, as in Black and White varieties.
So a Self Blue ("Lavender") should be a single uniform Blue throughout the plumage, now by adding Mottling you no longer have a Self colored fowl and no longer a Self Blue ("Lavender") color.
In my eyes if you would add Mottling to a "Lavender" colored fowl that color would now be a Blue Mottled.
Chris
Good point, Chris.
But, by the same token, lavender (aka "Self Blue") is a *gene* - which (as I'm sure you are well aware) is different from Andalusian blue. And Andalusian blue is the base for what we know as "blue mottled" in cochins.
If you add the mottling gene (or the barring gene - or for that matter, ANY pattern gene) to a lavender bird, it is STILL the lavender gene that causes the bird's base color - it doesn't become "blue". I mean, after all, a lavender mille fleur is a "porcelain", is it not? We don't call it "blue mille fleur" of course, because that would indicate the Andalusian blue gene, right? So why couldn't we have "lavender mottled"? Or a "lavender cuckoo"? Or a "lavender partridge"? Or, or, or...