Quote:
And what would you have written had you opened the post minus "Fight Photos," and seen the photographs of combat? Would you have been offended by the lack of decency to warn of graphic content?
I believe the point of the title was to avoid people being offended. If the content is clearly described, which I believe the title of this post is, how can one be offended by the photos included (especially when the post title includes "Fight Photos")?
I know it's been said time and again, but if a post is clearly titled as "Graphic," or "Fight Photos," and a person just can't handle graphic and combative, or bloody, why would that person even click on the the title?
I just don't get it.
And what would you have written had you opened the post minus "Fight Photos," and seen the photographs of combat? Would you have been offended by the lack of decency to warn of graphic content?
I believe the point of the title was to avoid people being offended. If the content is clearly described, which I believe the title of this post is, how can one be offended by the photos included (especially when the post title includes "Fight Photos")?
I know it's been said time and again, but if a post is clearly titled as "Graphic," or "Fight Photos," and a person just can't handle graphic and combative, or bloody, why would that person even click on the the title?
I just don't get it.