Quote:
OK... sorry but I'm having a hard time understanding the logic here - perhaps you could help me out. Just trying to understand your point of view here
I thought the
intent of handicap parking spots was to aid those who have
mobility problems and difficulty walking... right?
So if someone doesn't appear to have a mobility problem, is it consistent with the intent of the law for them to use a handicap spot anymore than anyone else who doesn't appear to have a mobility problem? I mean are they really mobility challenged enough to justify using one of those spots?
Secondly, is it really fair to criticize folks in the above situation? Are you advocating that people never question something that appears wrong and out of place? After all people who challenge others on their use of handicap parking are really just trying to help make sure those spaces are there for folks that need them. I have personally known someone who used their parent's placard - and we all know there is a lot of abuse of these spots.
Perhaps the crux of the problem is that "Handicap Parking" should have been called something like "Limited Mobility" parking instead.
Some people have lung or heart problems, that you wouldn't see.
That's right. My mother has been terminal for years. She has a heart condition. She walks okay for a lady of 71 who has arthritis but she shouldn't be walking very far and she can't walk at all on really hot or humid days so she has a handicapped sticker-now the problem with this is that Mom doesn't drive. The sticker is in my brother's car so that when he takes her somewhere she can safely walk a shorter distance to the store. But my brother also uses it when she's not with him and that's wrong.