Of course I get that, and the same is true for me.
The way I get my % (in this instance) is protein calories divided by total calories. Or even protein grams divided by total grams per serving. Somehow they aren't giving me the same calculation. One says 12% while the other is 34%.
And while I agree they are usually palatable and a good source of nutrients, I just don't want it spread they are "high" in protein IF they actually aren't (12% is pretty low), when diminishing the protein content is rarely ever the intent of our suggestions.
So just for the sake of figuring out if they are indeed "high" protein, can you help me work through the math to get it right? Or describe to my over thinking brain where it's going wrong?
So if a 50g egg has 6 grams or 24 protein calories, out of 70 total.
I feel like the calorie content might be irrelevant since 1 gram of fat has more calories than a gram of protein but weighs the same. So 5 gram of fat is 45 calories and 6 grams of protein is 24 calories. Or does that make the weight irrelevant...
Do you understand what I'm asking?! This has been bugging me for some time now.

And now that I have been able to work through it with some one... I think my answer is..
Protein 6/50 g= .12 weight or 24/70 kcal = .34
Fat 5/50 g= .10 weight or 45/70 kcal= .64
(.98)
So, it must be the calorie content that actually matters more than the weight. Since they add up to 100% but the weight does not.
I am always looking to learn here, and not worried at all about being "right".
So by these calculations... can I figure that eggs ARE indeed "high" in protein... to the tune of about 34%??? (even if 64% of fat, not the question)

Anyone able to confirm? Sorry slightly off topic, but I think important knowledge none the less.