Hi Janet! They are darling! I don't know how you could bare to part with Z', but lucky for Davlyn!
They inspired me to resurrect my silver-laced Polish project --- mine are LF, though, not bantams.
A frizzled, crested, rumpless NN that lays blue eggs sounds delightful!
Thanks Kev! I'm going to hang this 'pearl' on a Naked Neck *page* if that's OK with you!
They inspired me to resurrect my silver-laced Polish project --- mine are LF, though, not bantams.
A frizzled, crested, rumpless NN that lays blue eggs sounds delightful!
Thanks Kev! I'm going to hang this 'pearl' on a Naked Neck *page* if that's OK with you!
The difference in % of chicks coming out with naked necks depends on if the naked neck parent(s) being pure or not pure for the NN gene.
For example:
Pure naked neck x feather-neck = 100% naked necked chicks.
Not-pure naked neck x feather-neck = 50% naked necked chicks, *50% feather-neck.
Not-pure naked neck x not pure naked neck = 75% naked necked chicks (with some being pure NN and most not-pure NN), **25% feather-neck.
*Feather-neck (non- NN) chicks from these matings do not have or carry the gene at all, even if both of their parents were NN.
**Feather-neck chicks from this mating is proof the NN parent(s) are not pure for it.
Did I make it less or more confusing? I'll edit it again after I look something up. Would pure naked neck be (NaNa) and one copy / not-pure naked neck (Na)
Because... I didn't know you could get feather-neck chicks from 2 NN parents. I don't think that ever happened here and it's good to know!
So these chicks would have to be (Na) / not-pure naked neck --- Pure naked neck x feather-neck = 100% naked necked chicks.
Or could they be (NaNa) / pure for naked neck?
These would have to be (Na)? --- Not-pure naked neck x feather-neck = 50% naked necked chicks.
I've managed to confuse myself.
Lisa
edit: Started a Naked Neck page . Grabbed some neat info from Hutt, "Genetics of the Fowl" on Naked Necks (skip the bit about Feather tumors in canaries and Apterylosis, hahaha).
For example:
Pure naked neck x feather-neck = 100% naked necked chicks.
Not-pure naked neck x feather-neck = 50% naked necked chicks, *50% feather-neck.
Not-pure naked neck x not pure naked neck = 75% naked necked chicks (with some being pure NN and most not-pure NN), **25% feather-neck.
*Feather-neck (non- NN) chicks from these matings do not have or carry the gene at all, even if both of their parents were NN.
**Feather-neck chicks from this mating is proof the NN parent(s) are not pure for it.
Did I make it less or more confusing? I'll edit it again after I look something up. Would pure naked neck be (NaNa) and one copy / not-pure naked neck (Na)
Because... I didn't know you could get feather-neck chicks from 2 NN parents. I don't think that ever happened here and it's good to know!
So these chicks would have to be (Na) / not-pure naked neck --- Pure naked neck x feather-neck = 100% naked necked chicks.
Or could they be (NaNa) / pure for naked neck?
These would have to be (Na)? --- Not-pure naked neck x feather-neck = 50% naked necked chicks.
I've managed to confuse myself.
Lisa
edit: Started a Naked Neck page . Grabbed some neat info from Hutt, "Genetics of the Fowl" on Naked Necks (skip the bit about Feather tumors in canaries and Apterylosis, hahaha).
Last edited: