Cons, just a few.
1) Expensive for the small farmer and taxpayer.
2) Falls under the umbrella of Homeland Security-all basic rights are suspended.
3) Invasive and damaging to property rights/unconstitutional
4) Repetitive program-systems are already in place for everything this purports to do.
5) Punishes the small farmer/flock owner by making him ID every single animal instead of a group like the Big Guys get to do.
6) ineffective for the purpose it was supposedly designed for. How is a number going to do anything to stop disease? Wont.
7) Worded so it has "catches". Says if an animal never leaves the property, it wont have to be IDd. Dumb. If you take your animal to the vet, it's left your property. They've got you then.
8) People will stop taking sick animals to the vet for fear of being IDd.
Pros? None.
*They dont even track sex offenders this closely, for Pete's Sake!*
Found this interesting and telling statement on someone's blog:
A Vietnam vet took one look at an NAIS report in the office last month, then said it all. Reminds me of the Viet Cong in Nam. The villagers were taxed heavily, so they kept a very, very few chickens, one cow, maybe one hog. Everything else was hidden in the jungle. The Cong took any real surplus. Your animal ID program has nothing to do with health. They just want to know where every morsel of food is. Just think of the times you have coming up.
An excellent book to read to see how the USDA works is "MAD SHEEP" by Linda Faillace. SCARY.