Thank you
@Pyxis . This is the letter I sent (everyone, feel free to use it, whole or in part), and I sent the link and a copy of this letter to the Hudson Valley Young Farmer's Coalition as well.
Dear Agriculture Committee Members,
I oppose Assembly Bill 4611 (A04611) as a farmer. I don't think that you are aware of, or have considered, the effect that this proposal will have on agriculture in this state.
First, it must be pointed out that stringent policies are already in place by shipping companies, as well as various federal and state animal welfare laws. Are you aware that since the inception of the post office, BILLIONS of baby poultry have been safely shipped? There are hatcheries that have literally been shipping baby poultry for a century and more.
This practice is SO safe and common that ALL poultry raisers get at least some, and usually all, of their chicks by mail. Every chicken you have ever eaten has had a trip through the post office. Over 90% of the hens that lay the eggs that find their way to your kitchen were shipped to their farmer from a hatchery.
The breeding and hatching of poultry is such a specialized industry, that "hatchery" is a separate agricultural category. There are NO, literally ZERO commercial poultry operations that maintain separate breeding and production flocks on the same farm. While yes, you can find that on the backyard or hobby scale, farms that produce hundreds of eggs daily - the ones that supply our supermarkets and feed our cities - do not and
cannot, as it would increase their overhead cost by unrealistic amounts.
For meat production, that number becomes even more ridiculous, as meat birds are hybrids from 3 or more parent lines. That means that if they cannot get chicks shipped, a broiler farm would have to maintain THREE breeding flocks themselves, to get chicks to raise for your table.
A ban on shipping would take eggs and poultry from a cheap. affordable, sustainable protein source to a rare and expensive luxury. Do your children eat chicken nuggets? Kiss them goodbye. Even Tyson doesn't maintain breeding and production flocks on the same farms - it's a cross-contamination risk; . Breeding flocks are maintained on one property, eggs for hatching are shipped to a sterile hatching facility, then chicks are shipped out to be raised on contract farms all across the country.
But not in NY if you pass this.
New York City already has a problem with food deserts. Do you really want to make it impossible to farm poultry in-state? Do you think that will help feed our cities?
New York state already has a problem with a decreasing number of farms. Do you really think that destroying the poultry industry in state will help that? This will not encourage the creation of more hatcheries - distances upstate are already too vast. This will CLOSE every last hatchery in NY, they
all rely on shipping chicks.
I understand and appreciate that this is in the concern of animal welfare. I literally devote my life to animal welfare - I take care of animals every day, in all weather, 365 days a year. They are not just a commodity to me, I do this because I love them, I want to KNOW that the animals that help feed my family have good, happy lives. I believe we owe them our care and our respect. But I need you to understand that in trying to
fix a problem that doesn't exist, you are creating so many, many more.
Friends, there are already regulations that ensure that animals that cannot be safely shipped, aren't shipped. This bill is already unnecessary. If you are truly working from a concern for animal welfare, craft and pass a bill to increase funding to the USPS - especially in these trying times, people are relying on shipping for basic necessities, like dog food. Work on modernizing infrastructure.
But please, do
not pass a bill that might feel good and pander to a tiny group of well-meaning, yet ignorant people, that will simultaneously destroy poultry production and harm our ability to feed people.
Thank you for your time
Lauren McKendry
Arrows Flight Farm