- Nov 9, 2013
- 1,882
- 2,557
- 331
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_extinct_animals_of_Australia
Careful what you wish for, campers! So much detail that needs to be very carefully checked over!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_extinct_animals_of_Australia
Three species of emus listed here as extinct. And check the photo above against the photos of the Kangaroo and King Island sub-species listed in the Wiki article.
But just thinking out aloud about the engraving pictured above: 'The [birds] were thought to be a male and female of the same subspecies, but are possibly a Kangaroo Island emu and King Island emu[15]'
Is the drawing of a pair? or two birds of separate species? I'd guess a pair (that is, same species)
Why? If you are familiar with breeding-pairs, what you see in the engraving is a representation:
the bird sitting, surrounded by chicks, would be the male. Note that the chicks have no toosh feathers -- so they're young, regardless of how big they seem to be. This suggests that the chicks are newly-hatched.
Next: the female is 'flaring,' as she would do while defending the breeding-territory. (The literature says the females leave after laying; but I have seen two stay the full seven weeks of the incubation.)
And can anyone pick the other tiny detail? Well, there's a tiny bit of 'sideways boogie' in the stance/walk of the bird 'flaring,' which suggests to me that the artist observed the emus in question somewhat. (Note the blue of the skin shown, and that both eyes have a correct shade of orange.)
So, it's a tableau of the species: dominant female with male hatching chicks.
Careful what you wish for, campers! So much detail that needs to be very carefully checked over!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_extinct_animals_of_Australia
Three species of emus listed here as extinct. And check the photo above against the photos of the Kangaroo and King Island sub-species listed in the Wiki article.
But just thinking out aloud about the engraving pictured above: 'The [birds] were thought to be a male and female of the same subspecies, but are possibly a Kangaroo Island emu and King Island emu[15]'
Is the drawing of a pair? or two birds of separate species? I'd guess a pair (that is, same species)
Why? If you are familiar with breeding-pairs, what you see in the engraving is a representation:
the bird sitting, surrounded by chicks, would be the male. Note that the chicks have no toosh feathers -- so they're young, regardless of how big they seem to be. This suggests that the chicks are newly-hatched.
Next: the female is 'flaring,' as she would do while defending the breeding-territory. (The literature says the females leave after laying; but I have seen two stay the full seven weeks of the incubation.)
And can anyone pick the other tiny detail? Well, there's a tiny bit of 'sideways boogie' in the stance/walk of the bird 'flaring,' which suggests to me that the artist observed the emus in question somewhat. (Note the blue of the skin shown, and that both eyes have a correct shade of orange.)
So, it's a tableau of the species: dominant female with male hatching chicks.
Last edited: