Question on GMO feed

[Spifflove]

Quote:
But there are other human senses that can detect the wind, so this example is not a valid argument.

Sure it is. The tree branches need not have gotten there by the wind. They might have:
1. Been dropped from the back of a truck.
2. Leftover remains of alchemy experiment.
3. Moved there by magical pixies.

 

[Spifflove]

Here is the 1961-2012 corn production figures for Zimbabwe.
http://www.indexmundi.com/agriculture/?country=zw&commodity=corn&graph=production
Notice from the graph that when Mugabe assumed power effective 01/01/1988 that corn production plummeted from a high of 2,950,000 metric tons in 1984 to a low of 360,000 metric tons in 1991. I also call an 81.9% reduction in production real destruction. Despite modest increases in the 2011 and 2012 corn crop, yields today are currently less than they were in 1961 during a civil war. How is food production in Zimbabwe being effected by Kissinger. Don't even bother to answer if you are going to say "Because I said it is."

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...wOMtORtfYJCayPwKPWs12zA&bvm=bv.44697112,d.b2I

Because I said it is.

 

[chickengeorgeto]

Sure it is. The tree branches need not have gotten there by the wind. They might have:
1. Been dropped from the back of a truck.
2. Leftover remains of alchemy experiment.
3. Moved there by magical pixies.

I am sorry but the above examples are all reasons commonly given by anti-GMO activist for their opposition to transgenic crops. I don't want to steal you thunder. There is little enough enough of it on your side as it is. So Sorry.

 

[Spifflove]

I am sorry but the above examples are all reasons commonly given by anti-GMO activist for their opposition to transgenic crops. I don't want to steal you thunder. There is little enough enough of it on your side as it is. So Sorry.

Ok, sorry I don't follow you here. I noticed when as soon as I offered to look directly at the study it was like holding a cross before a vampire.

 

[hemet dennis]

Quote:
I think blaming Kissinger is rather narrow minded.

 

[hemet dennis]

Quote: Show me where in these studies it say that GMO's are bad for you please.

 

[Summerlove]

http://www.naturalnews.com/039778_evidence-based_science_murdered_GMO.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/037249_GMO_study_cancer_tumors_organ_damage.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/036710_GMO_animal_experiments_infertility.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/037621_GMO_side_effects_cancer.html

http://www.naturalnews.com/032201_pesticides_birth_defects.html


I would love to see some proof GMO's are good for you

 

[Cindy in PA]

X2 Summerlove!

 

[Spifflove]

Ok what we are going to do is this: We are going to actually read the study. I will first present the discredited dinosaur media spin with the embeded article. Now that the GMO champions will immediatly latch on and say "oh look see the study is discredited!" because the media that continually discredits itself by lying to its audience says so. Because they said so, therefore it is so.

So this is going to take a while. Several days. So be patient. Read the articles, but most importantly read the linked study. That will take some time and effort and study. I will help to break it down for you but it will require effort on both our parts. But if you choose to remain disengaged, to remain tuned into the TV/sports/video games/whatever and to accept everything spoonfed to you you will get more of the same. More gmo, more dangerous substances and toxins introduced into our water, our food, even radioactive isotopes dumped in our silverware. Don't believe me? Research it.

Here are the links to two mainstream articles, and one even links directly to the study. Follow the link to the study itself.





http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_...ut-other-scientists-skeptical-about-research/

"This new study is destined to raise more questions than it answers," he said. But at this point, a few things are clear. It is outrageous and shocking that this is the first long-term feeding study, even though genetically engineered foods have been on the market for nearly 20 years."

The link to the study is in this article:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevens...ly-modified-corn-cause-cancer-a-flawed-study/

To sum up: We are going to explore, investigate, examine, think and discover. Maybe the study will be proven wrong, maybe the study will be proven right. Maybe a combination. Who knows what we will uncover.

 

[Summerlove]

When considering sources of information keep in mind that 6 corporations own the US media

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/...trol-almost-everything-we-watch-hear-and-read