Question on GMO feed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wait but how far down the rabbit hole does this go? If I grow food in my garden no pesticides just plain old cow poop is it GMO? Do I have to look at the seeds and make sure they are pure? I want the best for my babies!!
 
Last edited:
Wait but how far down the rabbit hole does this go? If I grow food in my garden no pesticides just plain old cow poop is it GMO? Do I have to look at the seeds and make sure they are pure? I want the best for my babies!!
Look for this symbol on the seed pouch:
 
LOL
"Natural News" is the most UNBIASED source you can find?
Ok Mike Adams has a profit motive. But he does not have the money necessary to buy the opinions of scientists, unlike another company I know who has a (former?) employee as the head of the FDA. So who should I trust? The man who warned of the bitcoin collapse the day before it happened or the media that has lied to me time and time again, day after day, and pumped the bitcoin bubble by promoting it?

Besides what do you have against healthy, happy, frolicking goslings? After watching Mike's videos I now feed my dog 2 raw eggs every morning. It's the first time he would touch chicken eggs and he is already gaining weight and a shiny coat.
 
Last edited:
From the USDA website:
"The term "genetically modified organism" (GMO) was originally used by the molecular biology scientific community to denote a living organism that had been genetically modified by inserting a gene from an unrelated species. Incorporation of genes from an unrelated species does not occur in nature through sexual reproduction".

That is what GMO truly are.

Taking an herbicide component like Glycosphate and infusing it with edible plant genes is science gone insane. Now, if the EPA requires that products containing Glycosphate are to be labeled for warning against "oral intake, mandated protective clothing, and not re-entering treated fields for 4 hours", then how can they in collusion with the FDA claim it is acceptable and "safe" for humans or animals to ingest in food?

Bear Foot prefers government to be his god, dictating what is good and what is bad for the citizenry they wish to control in every possible way. He never did answer my question about his career and retirement from a government agency. Regardless of his agenda, my God is the author of common sense and everything created in its natural order. I'll trust my God. Others can trust whomever.
 
Last edited:
From the USDA website:
"The term "genetically modified organism" (GMO) was originally used by the molecular biology scientific community to denote a living organism that had been genetically modified by inserting a gene from an unrelated species. Incorporation of genes from an unrelated species does not occur in nature through sexual reproduction".

That is what GMO truly are.

Taking an herbicide component like Glycosphate and infusing it with edible plant genes is science gone insane. Now, if the EPA requires that products containing Glycosphate are to be labeled for warning against "oral intake, mandated protective clothing, and not re-entering treated fields for 4 hours", then how can they in collusion with the FDA claim it is acceptable and "safe" for humans or animals to ingest in food?

Bear Foot prefers government to be his god, dictating what is good and what is bad for the citizenry they wish to control in every possible way. He never did answer my question about his career and retirement from a government agency. Regardless of his agenda, my God is the author of common sense and everything created in its natural order. I'll trust my God. Others can trust whomever.

There's a sausage plant that is told by the FDA they must keep the floors wet to keep down dust, and OSHA tells them they must keep their floors dry to prevent falls. So they end up getting fined by one part of the Government or the other.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom