Question on GMO feed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote:
Once again, by continuing to talk, you've proven you REALLY DON'T KNOW what you're talking about

Quote:
Lame, rambling rhetoric won't make up for your obvious ignorance of the subject
It's just an attempt at diversion
 
Quote: Exactly.
He will post anything that adds to his sales figures, even if it's totally false.
When you SELL organic products, you PROMOTE organic products
 
Quote: So two reporters got fired by a TV station (NOT by Fox)

Monsanto didn't "have them fired", and the reporters LOST a trial by jury when they sued the station

More propaganda with no substance from the anti Monsanto crowd
 
Exactly.
He will post anything that adds to his sales figures, even if it's totally false.
When you SELL organic products, you PROMOTE organic products
I figured you would pare that quote off the way you did. So tell me, what was Mike Adams political campaign contributions to Romney and Obama and what were Monsanto's? Thought so.

Mike Adams does not profit directly from organic food sales [general mills does]; so he is free to warn about abuses in the system like when big agra gets non organic stuff like Neotame put in there without labeling or the toxic products produced in China and put into the organic food supply by big agra. He tells you how to avoid that stuff.

Mike Adams has a profit motive in your good health. Monsanto has a profit motive in your ill health. You lose, they make money.

Gentlemen, we stand on the precipice of destiney for all humankind. Either you take control of your health back from big corporations, or we will face a very bleak future indeed:
 
Last edited:
So two reporters got fired by a TV station (NOT by Fox)

Monsanto didn't "have them fired", and the reporters LOST a trial by jury when they sued the station

More propaganda with no substance from the anti Monsanto crowd

Bwaahaahaa!!! I knew you would have something to say about this.
wink.png
You are so quick to discredit others opinions but honestly, your opinion can also be discredited in the same manner you discredit all the non-GMO supporters. Do we know that Monsanto didn't pay to have the information, that you support as gospel so vehemently, put out there? Nope, just like there is no proof on the other side.

So tell me this...you honestly don't think that Monsanto had anything to do with anything that happened to these 2 people? SERIOUSLY!?! No, they actually won at trial and a judge overturned it!! Another one that Monsanto has in their pocket. We live in a world where money talks and Monsanto has proved that over and over!! I'm sorry but you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out some of these things on your own. Monsanto is all about making money....PERIOD!! They could care less about the farmer, the people who consume their genetically engineered crops or the animals that consume them.

I'm all for a good debate people but be polite and considerate of others opinions. The name calling back and forth has nothing to do with the subject at hand. Just sayin'!!
 
As a measure of the truthfulness of the two reporters and the story that supposedly cost them their jobs, as far as I am aware there is still not a test that can find rBGH (recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone) or prove it is in milk much less different rBGH from the NATURALLY occurring Bovine Growth Hormone found in all cows' milk you or your children drink.

Here is something right from the horses’ or I should say the cows’ mouth about rBGH. It appeared in the New York Times as a news story, It did not pop up from some opinion blogg floating in cyber-space.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/business/11feed.html

Quote:
 
As a measure of the truthfulness of the two reporters and the story that supposedly cost them their jobs, as far as I am aware there is still not a test that can find rBGH (recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone) or prove it is in milk much less different rBGH from the NATURALLY occurring Bovine Growth Hormone found in all cows' milk you or your children drink.

Here is something right from the horses’ or I should say the cows’ mouth about rBGH. It appeared in the New York Times as a news story, It did not pop up from some opinion blogg floating in cyber-space.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/business/11feed.html
I think the header of that article says it all:

"THE Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture has decided that consumers are too dim to make their own shopping decisions."
lau.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom