Spaniels are sweet but they are just not as smart as a lab. They're decently smart dogs but my neighbor is a good breeder of English Springer Spaniels and has very good quality dogs and they're just dumb put up next to a lab.
That makes them more difficult to train and they are pretty hyper. They don't have an "off" switch like a lab does. You could work a lab until they passed out or died and they would just keep going but if you made them lay around the house for two months they would just be ok with it. I'm not saying you'd ever want to but the ability to tell them to be calm and have them listen is invaluable. I've started spaniels for the neighbor before and I vowed I'd never have a spaniel after that, lol. They just are not as easy to train, they don't catch on as quickly and it gets frustrating especially when all I had previously trained were labs.
I've also hunted with cocker spaniels, field spaniels, and water spaniels. They're all the same.
I've been around pretty much all of the breeds of dogs more commonly kept in the US, and even some very rare ones too, and if I were to ever have a dog besides a lab it would be either a well bred Border Collie or a German Shepherd.
I've not ever found any other dogs that measure up to those three in terms of intelligence and trainability.
Pretty much agree with this !
I'm 62 years old so I've been around a while and have had several dogs. I currently have (or maybe they have me), two Labs. And a German Shepherd. And one of our son's German Shepherd's lives with us. So we have 4 dogs in our house. All 4 are amazing.
I used to hunt a lot and I've owned another lab previously, two English Springer (Spaniels), one English Cocker Spaniel, and a Brittany which has been the "official" AKC breed name for a couple of decades or so. As to separate them from all the "Spaniels" due to the fact they point instead of flush game.
Of the Spaniels I like the Brittany the best. But the one I had was my "one dog of a lifetime" dog. He was special. And he was he smartest dog I've had of the sporting breeds, at least when it came to things like figuring out hunting situations. He was also very willing and eager to accept training and after he learned that training was fun he usually learned things quickly, often the first time we tried. I once got us lost when we encountered a snow storm while hunting in some draws in far western Oklahoma. I finally told the dog "Chance, let's go to the truck" because I was getting worried it was going to get dark. (this was before cell phones or handheld GPS. you know "ancient times" LOL. ) You guessed it, he led me back to the truck. And we didn't have to do a lot of backtracking to get there.
To be fair to our two labs, they have not gotten anywhere near the training the Brittany received. Once they learned how to be "good citizens" (basic obedience) we haven't asked much more from them. One of them still needs occasional refresher training because she thinks she's smarter than the trainer (me or my wife).
The Springers and the English Cocker we had were all from good sporting bloodlines. I am not sure I'd say they were "dumb" as much as I'd say they were "goofy" and slow to agree to incorporate the training.
(Brittany's are goofy but in a good way, mischievously). The problem with the Springers and English Cocker I had were they were just all a bit too eager. too enthusiastic, and they'd be like a student that would try to always jump ahead and solve the problem before the teacher was done presenting it. Or skip three pages of reading in the homework.
They DID kind of settle down and "figure it out" after two or three hunting seasons and a LOT of repetition in training. I had them before I had the Brittany and I think after the 2nd or 3rd training session with the Brittany when it was a young pup a light bulb clicked on in MY brain and I was like, "Wow, this is EASY" (compared to the Springers/Cocker)
Obviously, someone could have had vastly different experiences with other Springers and Cockers and my "sample size" of 3 dogs is probably NOT a true indicator. But, having been around a lot of other Springer/Cockers and Brittany's I feel like my experience is fairly accurate.
The one thing that Springers and Cockers beat out a lot of other dogs at is for sure sweetness. But sometimes that also causes them to be more "clingy" and have more separation anxiety when their handler / family isn't around.
Now when it comes to "smart" dogs, German Shepherds are wowsa! They are very intelligent, plus their stoicism and serious demeanor makes them able to soak up a lot in training sessions. The ones we have are just "average" (don't tell them I said that) compared to some I've seen in competitions, protection dog training, etc.
Our son is a K9 trainer so we see a lot of dogs since he lives at home (just graduated from college) and does training on our property.
JD