- Thread starter
- #4,381
There is not one iota of doubt in my mind Ralphie would be carrying chocolate. Any good little Ralphie carry's chocolate to give to the girls.
Ralphie's ain't dumb. They know what helps grease the wheel so to speak..






Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is not one iota of doubt in my mind Ralphie would be carrying chocolate. Any good little Ralphie carry's chocolate to give to the girls.
Ralphie's ain't dumb. They know what helps grease the wheel so to speak..
Yes. . the lighter one in question is in fact a girl.Genetics maybe aren't the best way to start a morning, lol.
Oh, even easier way to test this theory - are any at all of the chocolate ducklings female? If yes, breed them to Duck. If any ducklings at all hatch expressing chocolate, Duck carries chocolate.
But question. . I thought it only took one parent to carry the chocolate to get a girl? 2 for a drake? So how would that prove duck was carrying the gene?
Please excuse my ignorance![]()
Ok, I think I understand all of that except the part where she can only give chocolate to her sons. That part is over my head a bit.Right, so any ducklings at all being chocolate proves that he carries itHe will pass chocolate to roughly half of his female offspring, which would make them chocolate right off the bat. But that's hard to see on a mallard base.
So breeding him to this girl does three things: First, if she's homozygous for the E base, no mallard base ducklings to make it hard to spot chocolate. If she does carry mallard base, we still have half the ducklings coming out on E base. Secondly, she'd be passing chocolate to all her sons too. So if Duck carries chocolate, he'd be passing it to half his sons. So the two together could produce chocolate drakes, which gives a larger pool of ducklings that chocolate might express on.
Lastly, she can only give chocolate to her sons, and only one copy, so unless the ducklings are getting copies of chocolate from him too, none of them can be chocolate. So if any chocolate ducklings at all hatch from that breeding, Duck has to be carrying chocolate. And if none do, then he's not, and it's back to the drawing board.
Ok, I think I understand all of that except the part where she can only give chocolate to her sons. That part is over my head a bit.
Why is that? My understanding was that 1 chocolate copy from either parent could make a chocolate girl.
Wow this is confusing!
I don't think duck will like being separated from Jane.
But I may have to do this just cause my curiosity is killing me! I could put them in the condo together around the end of January. .it's currently empty. Then I could steal her eggs and incubate them!
Ah ha! Ok. That was the missing link. So drakes can pass it on to both sons and daughters. . hence the reason thea was able to pass it to little tiger. . meaning tigers dad had a chocolate gene also. . meaning duck had to pass it to Ralphie dux. . Ralphie dux is the father of Alex the blue Bibb .. Who then fathered both chocolate colored ducklings.In Sex-link color genes, females only carry one copy (received from their dad), and they only pass it to their sons.
You mean my ducks? like family tree with their *suspected* colors?So could one of you do a list of names with their colors?
You mean my ducks? like family tree with their *suspected* colors?