Hmmm Maybe someone should send me some Eggs from this line and I'll see what I get as far as any Columbian coloring and horn colored beaks. I'll take good care of them I promise!
What's happening with the Columbian showing up is that one of the Hens is missing a barring gene, or has a heterozygous barring gene. From what I have been able to read on the Coloring Genes.. it is a combination of the S (silver) gene, with the Co (columbian)columbian gene that gives the base color. Removing the wild type and adding the white/silver while allowing the black back in. Then you add in the B (barring gene) to get the barring, this will create an all over barring pattern, but because the base color is white/silver it won't show up on most of the body, except where there is black.
Now.... I'm thinking one of Cyn's Hens has a B/b+......or some such combination. If a Hen and a Rooster were to both have a B/b+ then 25% of the offspring would have a Columbian look with the b+/b+ gene combination which would make barring a recessive or not happen at all I'm not sure on that part yet.
Laney
What's happening with the Columbian showing up is that one of the Hens is missing a barring gene, or has a heterozygous barring gene. From what I have been able to read on the Coloring Genes.. it is a combination of the S (silver) gene, with the Co (columbian)columbian gene that gives the base color. Removing the wild type and adding the white/silver while allowing the black back in. Then you add in the B (barring gene) to get the barring, this will create an all over barring pattern, but because the base color is white/silver it won't show up on most of the body, except where there is black.
Now.... I'm thinking one of Cyn's Hens has a B/b+......or some such combination. If a Hen and a Rooster were to both have a B/b+ then 25% of the offspring would have a Columbian look with the b+/b+ gene combination which would make barring a recessive or not happen at all I'm not sure on that part yet.
Laney