- Jan 2, 2015
- 44
- 4
- 25
As I have said before and I will say again. It is an inherent instinct in all kinds of animals to establish dominance in a herd or flock. This instinct usually takes the form of brutal combat between males of the that kind. This is true of all breeds of chickens, not just games. Take any rooster of any breed, isolate it with it's own hens for a while or take it to a new farm and there will be immediate violent combat between that rooster and any other rooster it comes in contact with. This is totally natural and completely necessary as a mechanism of survival, if the birds were in a wild existence. There is nothing evil about this natural instinct. What is evil, is when man tries to manipulate this natural instinct into something destructive for his own profit, pride or personal glory. But the evil occurs only on the part of man, for in order for one to create evil, one must be able to comprehend what is right and wrong. Humans have all kinds of natural but evil desires that we must must resist everyday because we know they are wrong. But we often try to excuse our behavior by saying, "Well, it's only natural". If this were a valid argument, then it should be okay to go rob a bank, because it is a natural desire to want to be rich, or to punch that guys lights out that cut you off in traffic. But no, since we as humans have the ability to comprehend the difference between right and wrong, and also the ability to choose whether to follow or resist our negative natural desires, then we cannot justify our actions based on the argument of "Natural Instinct or Desire".
I agree with this. I'm still learning how to use the 'quote' and 'reply' functions on this site. I started out trying to help Rocky understand what to expect from games since he's new to them. I'm guilty of often trying to condense a lifetime of 'understanding' into a few paragraphs and when you are in a group of folks at ALL different levels of experience, I think it's inevevitable that you are going to have some folks scratghing their heads and thinking, 'that sounds kina contradictory', and that's to be expected too. Let me just try to clarify a couple of comments.
"A properly bred game" - What I meant was, as long as you don't have the 'odd bird' or birds that someone perpetuated from a 'man fighter', then you don't have to worry about your gamecock indescriminantly attacking cats, children etc. True, they may show aggression toward a dog for example, but that just goes back to understanding what, why, what's the circimstance and does the chicken see your dog as 'spot' the way you do, or as a wolf or fox.
"They are just chickens. They do what chickens do" - Reading over my post, particularly the proceeding paragraph, I can see where this could be seen as me agreeing with the court ruling. What I meant should have been properly directed to those with little to no experience with games. I meant to say that as long as you take proper precautions, be it tie cords or pens with solid walls or keeping only a single cock etc., to keep your gamecock seperate from others, then they behave like any other chicken and 'do what chickens do, meaning eat, poop, scratch in the dirt, top hens, keep a watchful eye for preditors and chase off dogs lol.
As a young man I spent a lot of time and effort 'tilting windmills' so to speak and you might have guessed that. Old habbits die hard. As i grow older I'm finding it easier and much more relaxing to concern myself about litterally, what going on in 'my own backyard', especially since much of society seems to have gone completely insane. After over twenty years of my wife's influence I have become increasingly guilty of humanizing our dogs, but I WILL NOT humanize my chickens lol. I enjoy them very much, so I guess you could say they are my 'pets'. I prefer to see my pets healthy and happy 'in my backyard'. And you are 100% right when you say, to paraphrase, humans cause the problems, not the animals. Be it a chicken or a dog or whatever...the vast majority of the time it is human error/ignorace involved whenever there is a problem with animals, excluding the 'rare bird'.