Quote:
First off, I want to make it very clear that I am against Round-Up, and had a really big fight with DH because he sprayed the stuff all through the garden last spring.
That being said... I went on a mission to find anything on line about Round-Up not being so safe, and this study was the one that has been repeatedly held up as the basis of Round-Up not being safe and I believe that the study is flawed. There needs to be more studies into it, but they need to be realistic. There are a lot of chemicals used commonly that I am sure would harm an embryo if they were injected. For example, what if they were to inject chlorine into an embryo? People drink the stuff daily, swim in it, and use it to clean and disinfect. If Round-Up truly does cause that many birth defects, why don't I see them here? Round-Up has been sprayed for
years in North Dakota. Not only to kill weeds, but also sprayed onto wheat fields if the field isn't drying evenly.
In the end the one thing that convinced DH to quit spraying everything with the stuff (besides having to deal with the wrath of the wife) was the 2003 Danish ban because the stuff wasn't breaking down in the soil as they thought it would and was filtering through the ground to contaminate water supplies.
I would love to see better studies!
My cousin who is a Geneticist worked on some of the research on glyphostate (the agent in Round-Up). He was not working for Monsanto and he got paid anyway despite the outcome. So the results didn't really matter to him.
Because of certain confidentiality contracts he cannot speak about the particulars of the results. He probably would have to make it in simple terms for us anyway.
But he will not use Round-Up or any food that is Round-Up ready of any genetically modified food. He cautions on Organic because it doesn't necessarily mean organic anymore.
He told me it would be wise to buy local and know where you food comes from.
But that is his opinion.
http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/GMO/Roundup_Study/roundup_study.html