I quite understand, and am sorry to have disquieted you over this. Patterson's definition garnered a lot of discussion at the time. Perhaps I should just quote a little to show where he's coming from.I consulted the OED which has over 4 pages (of the full second edition) devoted to slave and slavery and nearly as much to honour and honourable.
I found the sense in which I was using the word - see number 2.a. below, and particularly the 1809 usage in the Wordsworth Sonnet.
View attachment 3702178
The closest I could come to a linkage of honour with slavery was via ignoble in this entry (number 2) which is fortunately both obsolete and rare.
View attachment 3702177
I think I will not alter my inner usage of the word honour, but based on all your reactions I will likely become more cautious in using it in public.
A shame really. The way I used it is a useful and important concept.
"Honor and power are intimately linked...the free and honorable person, ever alive to slights and insults, occasionally experiences specific acts of dishonour to which, of course, he or she responds by taking appropriate action... What was universal in the master-slave relationship was the strong sense of honor the experience of mastership generated, and conversely, the dishonoring of the slave condition... [now quoting Douglass:] a man without force is without the essential dignity of humanity. Human nature is so constituted that it cannot honor a helpless man, although it can pity him; and even that it cannot do long, if the signs of power do not arise [end of Douglass quote]... The idea that a person's honor is more valuable than his life, and that to prefer life to honor betray a degraded mind, comes close to being a genuinely universal belief... yet it was the choice of life over honor that the slave or his ancestor made, or had made for him. The dishonor of slavery...was not a specific but a generalised condition...
In this chapter [5] I propose to show that, first, in all slave societies the slave was considered a degraded person; second, the honor of the master was enhanced by the subjection of his slave; and third, wherever slavery became structurally very important, the whole tone of the slaveholders' culture tended to be highly honorific." The book is comparative and historical, and I found the argument compelling.