Announcement The Coop Page / Article Rating & Review Project!

[N F C]

I just tested it on an article I had commented on in 2015 and it accepted by rating with no problems.

Awesome, thanks Kim!

 

[CCUK]

Some of the coops I've rated have no reviews. Are we meant to be going through the 2 reviews?

 

[ronott1]

Some of the coops I've rated have no reviews. Are we meant to be going through the 2 reviews?

Good Question!

 

[21hens-incharge]

I think there were a few hidden files and then there are the ones getting cleaned up. I would expect an odd one here and there while this is all getting done.

Some of the coops I've rated have no reviews. Are we meant to be going through the 2 reviews?

 

[SavKel&RynKel]

Some of the coops I've rated have no reviews. Are we meant to be going through the 2 reviews?

Gotta get them all to five!
Every...single...one...


Ryn.

 

[Nifty-Chicken]

Some of the coops I've rated have no reviews. Are we meant to be going through the 2 reviews?

We only enabled "reviews" (text) relatively recently, and for the purpose of this project, we are mostly wanting "ratings" (stars) with or without text reviews.

Some members are spending a lot of time going through tons of coops writing reviews and others are only doing ratings. We're pleased and thankful for both!!!

 

[CCUK]

Gotta get them all to five!
Every...single...one...


Ryn.

Only like another potential 13,000 to do then!!! Keep going!! (no more pee breaks)

 

[CCUK]

We only enabled "reviews" (text) relatively recently, and for the purpose of this project, we are mostly wanting "ratings" (stars) with or without text reviews.

Some members are spending a lot of time going through tons of coops writing reviews and others are only doing ratings. We're pleased and thankful for both!!!

I don't really see the point on not writing something to support the star rating. Mine are generally brief but I still give both.

 

[Nifty-Chicken]

Only like another potential 13,000 to do then!!! Keep going!! (no more pee breaks)

Well, technically they can't review more than 3,000 since they can only rate each article once

I don't really see the point on not writing something to support the star rating. Mine are generally brief but I still give both.

I can totally understand that perspective. Obviously it would be great if each rating had an accompanying review, but we are also realistic knowing that this project would never get completed if we required a review with each rating.

Also, just having star ratings (from multiple peeps) is REALLY helping us identify the awesomest coop articles... as well as ones that should be fixed, moved, or even deleted.

It's been an amazing group effort!!!

 

[Nifty-Chicken]

A quick update regarding "tagging" coop articles:

We can search multiple tags, but I don't think we'll be able to create a permanent link to combinations of coop tags.

So, for example, it would be cool link to the search results to "small-coops" & "recycled" together... but it looks like that's not an option

(again, we can do a search for that compbo, but we can't bookmark that search).

There might be some other options, like tagging all coops that use recycled materials as "recycled coop", then from there peeps could see the category of the results: