YATZEE
Not every amendment has to start in the house.
Subsequently, the U.S. Supreme Court in 1916 upheld the progressive income tax as constitutional in Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 240 U.S. 1 (1916). The Supreme Court indicated that the amendment did not expand the federal government's existing power to tax income (meaning profit or gain from any source) but rather removed the possibility of classifying an income tax as a direct tax on the basis of the source of the income. The Amendment removed the need for the income tax to be apportioned among the states on the basis of population. Income taxes are required, however, to abide by the law of geographical uniformityThe 16th amendment to the constitution made the income tax making it part of the constitution. So what would the court rule on, if the constitution is constitutional ?
My life has improved under this administration. I have just begun year four in my business, and am close to finishing my degree online. I still own my house, raise chickens, and have a beautiful garden. Two of my children are doing great in public school, and my oldest is home schooled preparing for an early start at community college. Please don't imply I don't work or contribute to the system. I have paid a lot of taxes too
If what you mention are the most important issues to you then I cannot argue against those reasons for voting. I have yet to see the difference in shenanigans relating to party affiliates.
