Thank you!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not to be harsh but I wouldn't use any of them just based on the splotchy earlobes and bad tails. If I had to choose just one bird, I would go with the bottom male and cull really hard.
Not to be harsh but I wouldn't use any of them just based on the splotchy earlobes and bad tails. If I had to choose just one bird, I would go with the bottom male and cull really hard.
I was thinking the same thing but didn't want to say
Actually I am rather surprised to see all these Rees boys having so many faults. The line was hyped up to be the cream of the crop and I have yet to see one Rees boy that I like.
If it was me I would find a nice Cream roo from a different line and breed him with the Rees girls. I wouldn't stick with a line exclusively because of the name if they aren't producing nice birds.
Although I don't like the Rees females either (and no offense intended but to me they look like elderly ladies with pulled out hair) however for folks who like them, may be Reese's line may only have focussed on hens and not roosters. In either case GFF should have made some disclosure while charging $200/chick.I agree with both of you. I also tend to dislike the Rees males I have seen so far. My Rees male that I have is far from a good example, as well as many of the pics of Rees males I have seen thus far. I do however like many of the females from the Rees line.
For all of us--- Remember that not every chick that hatches is a show winner. The odds are very long that a chick will win in the genetic lottery -- maybe 10% of all the chicks hatched are truly keepers.