Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with you. It's well known what is meant when the phrase "Cornish Cross" is used. Trying to change it at this point will only make the confusion worse rather than lessen it.So what? They may be far removed from the original Cornish, but if you say Cornish Cross I know exactly what type of bird you are speaking about.
If you call them "Broilers" there are multiple types of broilers and they differ quite a bit. Different colors, different growth rates, different muscle structure, even different methods of raising and different feed requirements.
The same with "meaties". That could be any sort of "broiler". See above.
Cornish Cross just happens to be what that particular type of chicken is called. The world is full of misleading names for animals. I assure you, the Australian Shepherd did not come from Australia at any time of its development. But that is what it is called and if I call it Australian Shepherd, anyone who knows anything about dogs knows what breed I am referring to. It's clarity of communication, not genetic accuracy.
You'll note that he said New Hampshire Reds. It's the Reds appendage that is the problem since their proper name is simply New Hampshires.New hamps are recognized by the standard And have been since 1935. How can there be no such breed as you say if it is recognized?
New hamps are recognized by the standard And have been since 1935. How can there be no such breed as you say if it is recognized?
yeah sure if you dont own pure breed Cornish,but try to talk to some one who knows very little about chicken,as soon as you tell them you have Cornish birds they jump to the conclution that you are talking about "those chickens like they have at the grocery store". and the Australian sheperd comment...are you sure about those facts. any one with any pride in thier flock would like thier bird to be recognised for what they are,and my Cornish are no way cornish cross nor do those "cornish cross"have any resemblance to my Cornish. Thats what!So what? They may be far removed from the original Cornish, but if you say Cornish Cross I know exactly what type of bird you are speaking about.
If you call them "Broilers" there are multiple types of broilers and they differ quite a bit. Different colors, different growth rates, different muscle structure, even different methods of raising and different feed requirements.
The same with "meaties". That could be any sort of "broiler". See above.
Cornish Cross just happens to be what that particular type of chicken is called. The world is full of misleading names for animals. I assure you, the Australian Shepherd did not come from Australia at any time of its development. But that is what it is called and if I call it Australian Shepherd, anyone who knows anything about dogs knows what breed I am referring to. It's clarity of communication, not genetic accuracy.
I couldn't agree more. The hatcheries come up their there own names to sell chicks. Comets, queens, and stars sounds better than Red Sex Link to most people.I don't really have a dog in the hunt, just to be clear. I'm not an anti-hatchery snob, as I buy their products with eyes wide open. Cultural usage of words is fluid. Hatcheries use all kinds of titles for their birds, Comets, Queens, Stars, Araucanas, Cornish-Rock Cross to sell them. Hey, it's a free country I suppose, and the hatcheries are in business to sell birds.
But accuracy, to those who care about such things, as witnessed by the OP's creation of this thread, indicates some folks do care about all this. As long as the hatcheries use the terms they use, for the breeds, strains, mixes and hybrids they are selling, for 90% of the people who only see these birds and see them named in this way, that is a powerful effect. If the hatchery says they are this or that, then that must be the case. The web pages and catalogs are very authoritative and the influence is very strong.