- Nov 8, 2011
- 278
- 17
- 101
Quote:
I'm glad to see that someone else hasn't fallen for the rhetoric and the propaganda put out by ALBC. I too used to be a member, for years. In some ways they are a great organization, and they do a lot of good for the promotion of rare breeds, but they are mainly a think tank, a philosophical group whose philosophy isn't always grounded in reality. I'm not saying that shows are the be all and end all of poultrydom. Indeed, they are only a very small segment, but if ALBC would visit just one large show, their priority lists would get blown out of the water. Their surveys are extremely biased and unscientific. They survey only limited segments of the poultry breeding world, and then proclaim breeds to be rare based on the skewed results. Some of their proclamations are based on only a single "expert's" say so, usually one who has a commercial interest in seeing a breed touted as being endangered, such as a hatchery operator who is the only commercial source of a breed, or a heritage breed farmer who has a market cornered in a heritage breed's products. In some cases they ignore documented evidence of a breed which has existed for centuries, because they are limited commercially, yet they promote another breed which has been created only in the last few decades, because one of their supporters sells it and claims it be ols and rare, with no documentation whatsoever prior to his first breeding it. ALBC does put out a lot of good material. I own a lot of their publications. Some better than others, but a few are excellent.
IMO, many owe their survival to organizations such as the ALBC and organizations like them
Is the ALBC breeding these breeds? NO! So how is the ALBC doing more for the breed that a good breeder?
I was a member of the ALBC and found that there are far more organizations, groups and clubs that are doing more for these breeds than ALBC could ever do.
Let take the R.I. Red, the ALBC lists it as recovering, its recovering?
For the past few years the Single Comb Rhode Island Red large fowl has been called a very rare breed of poultry and during the winter months you might be able to count 200 adult birds and during the summer months maybe there will be a thousand birds in the USA. That's very rare, now the Rose Comb Rhode Island Red may have only about 50 adult birds during the winter months. These numbers changed very little if at all over the past few years. So I ask you how is this recovering? (These numbers are of non-hatchery standard bred fowl)
You would think that the American Livestock Breeds Conservancy would try to know a little more about the breeds that they are trying to preserve.
Chris
Is the ALBC breeding these breeds? NO! So how is the ALBC doing more for the breed that a good breeder?
I was a member of the ALBC and found that there are far more organizations, groups and clubs that are doing more for these breeds than ALBC could ever do.
Let take the R.I. Red, the ALBC lists it as recovering, its recovering?
For the past few years the Single Comb Rhode Island Red large fowl has been called a very rare breed of poultry and during the winter months you might be able to count 200 adult birds and during the summer months maybe there will be a thousand birds in the USA. That's very rare, now the Rose Comb Rhode Island Red may have only about 50 adult birds during the winter months. These numbers changed very little if at all over the past few years. So I ask you how is this recovering? (These numbers are of non-hatchery standard bred fowl)
You would think that the American Livestock Breeds Conservancy would try to know a little more about the breeds that they are trying to preserve.
Chris
I'm glad to see that someone else hasn't fallen for the rhetoric and the propaganda put out by ALBC. I too used to be a member, for years. In some ways they are a great organization, and they do a lot of good for the promotion of rare breeds, but they are mainly a think tank, a philosophical group whose philosophy isn't always grounded in reality. I'm not saying that shows are the be all and end all of poultrydom. Indeed, they are only a very small segment, but if ALBC would visit just one large show, their priority lists would get blown out of the water. Their surveys are extremely biased and unscientific. They survey only limited segments of the poultry breeding world, and then proclaim breeds to be rare based on the skewed results. Some of their proclamations are based on only a single "expert's" say so, usually one who has a commercial interest in seeing a breed touted as being endangered, such as a hatchery operator who is the only commercial source of a breed, or a heritage breed farmer who has a market cornered in a heritage breed's products. In some cases they ignore documented evidence of a breed which has existed for centuries, because they are limited commercially, yet they promote another breed which has been created only in the last few decades, because one of their supporters sells it and claims it be ols and rare, with no documentation whatsoever prior to his first breeding it. ALBC does put out a lot of good material. I own a lot of their publications. Some better than others, but a few are excellent.