- Thread starter
- #13,931
I got it...it just clicked.Sorry, I know I'm not making sense. I'm trying to do too many things at once on too little sleep.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I got it...it just clicked.Sorry, I know I'm not making sense. I'm trying to do too many things at once on too little sleep.
No need, unless you want to emphasize that it's a completely exact measurement. The lack of a decimal in informal context is construed to mean absolute precision. Now, if you did that in a paper you were trying to get published, you'd probably get lynched.I get it now.
I only decimal pointed out the Celcuis side of my cheat sheet.
I need to do the Fahrenheit side to.
Great!I got it...it just clicked.
I can see what I am trying to explain in my head... but it is extraordinarily difficult to explain to someone else in a text-based format.Great!
Not only that, you have to have an inspection first before you can even get the birds. I had a permit one year to raise and release pheasants. I was very fortunate that the game warden that I had to deal with went out of his way to make things as easy as possible for me.that doesn’t seem too bad, but does applying for the permit (free or paid for) make you subject to inspection?? that’s my main reason for not wanting to get permit here to keep regulated birds
You would need to do this if you wanted a resulting Fahrenheit measurement without a decimal place.I'm saying if you tell me it's 37 at your house how am I going to now if you mean 99 or 100.
You would need to use the damn decimal to be clear right?
37.7
Or 37.2
I much prefer [(°C/5) x 9] + 32 = °F because it allows me to deal with smaller numbers. Going the other way, [(°F-32)/9] x 5 = °CThe number in Celsius, times 9; the product of that then divided by 5, and then finally, the result of that added to 32.
It's hard trying to write it without mathematical notation. Hopefully that makes sense. It's the way I find easiest to do in my head.
Quite true, especially if you're trying to convert temperatures from the southern areas rather than those more common around the North Pole.I much prefer [(°C/5) x 9] + 32 = °F because it allows me to deal with smaller numbers. Going the other way, [(°F-32)/9] x 5 = °C
@Texas Kiki The easy ones are:
-40°F = -40°C
32°F = 0°C
99.5°F = 37.5°C
212°F = 100°C
I'm making a new cheat sheet now.You would need to do this if you wanted a resulting Fahrenheit measurement without a decimal place.
Much more comprehensive!I'm making a new cheat sheet now.View attachment 1884215