"treatment is experimental", "psychiatrists are nuts"
These are just excuses (and insults) and cause people to avoid help even more, compounding the problem. I'm not going to say every psychiatrist is at the top of his field, but they have the knowledge needed. While psychologists vary a great deal in background and methods and effectiveness, a psychiatrist is a medical doctor whose specialty is illnesses that affect behavior and thinking.
A clinical neuropsychologist is another option and has some overlapping areas of work with a psychiatrist, but it's hard these days to find one and get a very complete neuropsych workup covered by insurance. Too, their area tends to be more in brain injuries, seizures and the like. A psychiatrist has a broader training.
One of the chief advantages a psychiatrist has is complete medical training equal to a medical doctor, WITH specialized training in diseases and treatments of behavioral/mental diseases.
Not infrequently, working with a psychiatrist reveals that a behavioral problem actually is from a completely different disease, not a 'mental' disease at all. Electrolyte imbalance due to kidney disease, seizures, brain tumors, Lupus, and many, many other conditions and diseases can have effects on behavior. The psychiatrist has the training and knowledge to sort such things out.
If you see behavioral/thinking problems in a person, it is painting with a broad, broad brush to assume it is a 'mental disease'. One of the most violent, severely ill, hopeless kids I ever heard of, actually had psychomotor seizures, and went through years of incorrect treatment. Finally a psychiatrist sorted this out and in a few weeks, the kid was back in school and functioning totally normally - on a very small dose of anti seizure medicine.
There is a reason all that training is of value. It's crucial to find out what's REALLY causing the problem, and treat it appropriately.
There are ways that experts use to get non compliant sick people into treatment. The trouble is that is a long and painstaking process and a lot can happen during the time they are dealing with the person.
One psychiatrist told me that she felt that deep down, even the sickest person knows they need help, but their actions and their way of getting it, as well as the kind of help they think they need, all is so inconsistent and so poorly thought out that nothing effective or useful happens.
I've found that parents, in general, as much as they love their person, when the person is taken over by a disease that so profoundly affects their behavior, they need the help of experts to get this person into treatment. But with our broken, ineffective, bankrupt mental health care system, how do we accomplish that?
I've also found there are people that are beyond all help. The disease has just affected their brain too much. They lose so much of their ability to understand that they need help, that they just are unable to grasp it.
And I have ALSO found, that no one really can identify who is beyond help, and who is not. The most severe cases, very often, after some years of struggling against it, will agree to accept help.
Much of our problem is due to people with sentiments like those first quoted (anti treatment people), but it isn't just that. A great deal of it is about money.
Other countries DO handle this very, very differently. In Germany, it is a priority to get mentally ill people into treatment from the start of their illness. They are not problem free, but I meet many more Germans who have major mental illness who are working and productive.
We currently have committment laws. They are written to avoid allowing vengeful relatives to commit an uncooperative family member. The problem is in interpreting them and carrying them out. We've swung way over on one extreme direction in doing that - and THAT my friends, is about MONEY. Nothing else. Just money.