BUNNYLADY WROTE: SS x ss=50% silkied, 25% carrier, 25% non carrier <--- this should be 100% carrier
Absolutely correct! My mistake, again. It is 100% carrier for the silkied gene, if you know that both parents are in fact 1) silkied and 2) not a silkied gene carrier. I need to be more careful in my figures if I'm going to pass along information, eh?!
Punnett's Square is a theoretical, statistical approach to probable and knowngenetics. By stroke of luck would you actually get an accurate configuration off of only 4 offspring (since PS figures as the smallest probability 4 offspring). Much more accurate statistics come into play the larger the number of offspring produced, and if I remember correctly it becomes statistically effective or more precisely accurate at about 100 offspring.
And whoever said that ss is silkied and SS is smooth is also correct. When I figure in my head I always put the subject in question (in this case silkied) as the dominant, it just helps me figure quicker for some silly reason. When in fact it is the recessive and should be properly written as such, regardless of how my messed up thought process works, LOL.
A quick question to those breeding Sizzles I guess you call them... are there any feather quality issues you are seeing that's amplified by putting these two genes together? Is there still a main tail and wing that is expressed on a sizzle? With the silkieds, that's the desirable outcome, and I'm not sure how adding frizzled into the genotype changes this as I don't have any experience with the sizzles.
Absolutely correct! My mistake, again. It is 100% carrier for the silkied gene, if you know that both parents are in fact 1) silkied and 2) not a silkied gene carrier. I need to be more careful in my figures if I'm going to pass along information, eh?!
Punnett's Square is a theoretical, statistical approach to probable and knowngenetics. By stroke of luck would you actually get an accurate configuration off of only 4 offspring (since PS figures as the smallest probability 4 offspring). Much more accurate statistics come into play the larger the number of offspring produced, and if I remember correctly it becomes statistically effective or more precisely accurate at about 100 offspring.
And whoever said that ss is silkied and SS is smooth is also correct. When I figure in my head I always put the subject in question (in this case silkied) as the dominant, it just helps me figure quicker for some silly reason. When in fact it is the recessive and should be properly written as such, regardless of how my messed up thought process works, LOL.
A quick question to those breeding Sizzles I guess you call them... are there any feather quality issues you are seeing that's amplified by putting these two genes together? Is there still a main tail and wing that is expressed on a sizzle? With the silkieds, that's the desirable outcome, and I'm not sure how adding frizzled into the genotype changes this as I don't have any experience with the sizzles.