Quote:
There are already many breeds; he is simply wanting to ADD a breed that is currently unrecognised. Much in the same way that seramas or marans have been shown, although both are now recognuised (but only in this past year). The only confusing factor is the name, and as the breed entered is "British Orpington" and the British standard is provided to the show staff and judges (preferably ahead of time) it seems reasonable. If there are sufficient breeders and time working with the bird here in the US, then submitting a copy of the standard to the APA forfuture recognition also seems appropriate.
I understand that. But as originally stated, it sounded more complicated. Calling them different things, thus making them akin to being a "different" breed works. But just calling them both Orpingtons or one type an Orpington and another 'British Orpington' is fine. Sort of like what I said already. Problem is, we're currently calling them both the same thing, just putting a qualifier in front for one type, sometimes, not always, like English SOP or English Type or APA. Calling the ones that are more to the British SOP something other than "Orpington" does, in effect, add a "new" breed, though, even if it's the same breed as one already in there. Some, as evidenced by this thread, don't care for the idea. After seeing all the misunderstanding here, I am no longer offering any more opinions about it. I only stated facts, I don't mean to sway anyone one way or the other.