Quote:
Good suggestion.
But I'd like the OP to define 'mean'. For example, if someone writes something that offends, provokes or insults you (trolls and flamers, for example), is it mean to respond to make your own feelings known? If someone writes a pile of badly thought through rubbish, thereby showing a lack of respect for readers, is it mean to challenge their thinking? Is it mean to encourage them to get their brains into gear? Are they mean when they respond defensively with a personal remark?
So, does the OP refer to the first poster or the respondent when writing about meanness?
I don't follow the primitive 'eye for an eye' rule but do we always have to turn the other cheek?
If not being mean means never responding sharply to offence, then I too may get a few PM's.
Good suggestion.
But I'd like the OP to define 'mean'. For example, if someone writes something that offends, provokes or insults you (trolls and flamers, for example), is it mean to respond to make your own feelings known? If someone writes a pile of badly thought through rubbish, thereby showing a lack of respect for readers, is it mean to challenge their thinking? Is it mean to encourage them to get their brains into gear? Are they mean when they respond defensively with a personal remark?
So, does the OP refer to the first poster or the respondent when writing about meanness?
I don't follow the primitive 'eye for an eye' rule but do we always have to turn the other cheek?
If not being mean means never responding sharply to offence, then I too may get a few PM's.

Last edited by a moderator: