Quote:
I think we have been a civil group.... A few heated moments, but all and all quite polite to one another.. I actually do value Katy's viewpoint and learn to be more tolerant because of these debates..
I have opinions against anhydrous ammonia, for two reasons:
1. It is extremely energy demanding to manufacture.
http://www.ipm.iastate.edu/ipm/icm/2001/1-29-2001/natgasfert.html
Sure the farmer saves trips with the manure spreader but the on farm fuel costs are more than offset by the energy input into its manufacture.
2. Bad mojo for soil microorganisms... I would say it would take many years for a field to recover from that stuff to where you would get a decent yield with organic fertilizers.
I simply see it as environmentally bad, and not sustainable.
So Frosty, what do you not like about it?
ON
I'm not a fan of anhydrous either...it is dangerous to use.
We do spread the manure from our cow herd onto a few acres, but the majority of farmers don't even have livestock anymore, let alone to have enough to spread over hundreds or in some cases thousands of acres.
We use what we have available to us to make our living......someone invent something better and cheaper and we'll gladly use it.