I haven't studied the details of this new arrangement but, if I understand correctly, it will force people, to some extent, to buy private insurance. Please correct me if I have that wrong.
If that's so, I would say that it will succeed only as a first step. To work properly, the insurance must be State (Federal) run through tax contributions. Also, most of the resources must be either State owned or State controlled. If you leave the private sector, with its profit objectives, to run health it may be more expensive and those in most need will either be excluded or run out of cover. There's no reason why those who can should not pay for private treatment if that is their wish.
My impression is that Obama's scheme is a step in the right direction but needs to be developed much further. However if someone take the attitude that he is wealthy enough to cope with the private sector and doesn't care one jot for his fellows, then my views won't be accepted. If someone claims that social advances are unconstitutional, then I pity such a society.
But why would you stop at health care why not go to the oil companies or the lumber companies and on and on take the profit out of everything.
Pay for the oil with tax money and everyone gets free gas.
