About the type- I am personally aiming for more of a leghorn base type. They were meant to lay lots of eggs so they should have a longer back. I also prefer the leghorn tail just because it is more pleasing to look at
I agree that a quality Leghorn is an absolutely beautiful bird. The leghorns pictured a few posts back by Nicalandia have very long backs and very full tails.
What I would like to reconcile with is this photo that HaHaUThinkSo gifted us with of the Legbar from the Brit SOP - and it seems to be a stockier, less linear bird than the Leghorn....' This photo is the closest we have to a Punnett style CL from back-in-the-day. Okay it is a Legbar, not a Cream Legbar which is confusing-- but the Type should remain the same throughout the variations of the breed.
http://s22.postimg.org/a50mu4qe9/online_standard.gif
Yes, if there were color photos of Punnett's flock it would help us out. .....
Somewhere, I also had heard that the CL was a dual purpose bird - (dual purpose back in those days didn't match the meat-type birds raised in these days)... Several people are processing and planning to process the excess males for eating.
And some breeds are raised for showing only, some for egg production only and some for eggs and meat -- and I had thought that the CL veered a bit toward Dual - and thus may be heftier than the Leghorn. I have also heard that Leghorns have changed a lot in the last century, and even in CSU - there was a photo quiz where only the shapes of the breeds were shown and Walt said that the breeds have changed since that quiz was developed in 1919 or when it was.
I guess too, that if we expect a lot of eggs, we would lean toward a Leghorn type - (form following function)-- The
biggest problem we may have in all our current birds, and in UK birds too is the short back and the high tails -- and perhaps those go together...
ETA question for FMP does the B&W picture in the link meet closely enough with the Leghorn type that you are aiming for?