Me too!I'm liking my odd chick's coloration. Here she is out in better lighting.
View attachment 2718355View attachment 2718358View attachment 2718359
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Me too!I'm liking my odd chick's coloration. Here she is out in better lighting.
View attachment 2718355View attachment 2718358View attachment 2718359
Thanks.Me too!
If the lighter red is being described as chestnut, it doesn’t matter what the actual color of a chestnut is. There’s a lot of variety names that are misleading, such as brown red or golden salmon in marans (look it up- it’s actually a red duckwing variety).My book of SOP says New Hampshires are supposed to be a Dark Chestnut Red, but the picture shows a Darkish Buff for both neck, & body.
RIRs are Supposed to be a Dark Lustrous Red.
The other person says the disqualification for RIRs is being a lighter red, that's described as being as light as Chestnut.
My book of SOP says their Disqualification is White in the plumage. Same with the New Hampshires.
I say Mahogany, & Chestnut are the same since both are a dark rich red that's almost black. I point to the Gene Mahogany/Red for chickens.
Other person says mahogany, & chestnut are different, & points at what's said in the book of SOP describing chestnut as lighter then mahogany.
I like to stay true to color, according to where the color got it's name from.
Luckily I have an Actual chestnut.
I believe the lighter variant should be described as Hazelnut, which would be alot more accurate.
Yep, I know about those colors. Misleading names for colors is actually pretty annoying.If the lighter red is being described as chestnut, it doesn’t matter what the actual color of a chestnut is. There’s a lot of variety names that are misleading, such as brown red or golden salmon in marans (look it up- it’s actually a red duckwing variety).
It's a chestnut, just a different variety, not sure which. I had a couple larger ones, but not sure where they went. They were slightly lighter in color then the small one, but still a deep red.In many other situations, I think "chestnut" is used to mean various shades of red-brown, and "mahogany" is used to mean various dark shades of brown (often not as red), although of course it's not entirely consistent.
Within a given book (SOP), definitely go with the definitions that are in that book.
But when I look up photos of chesnuts online, most of them are lighter than your nut. So you might have an actual chesnut that is not "chestnut" in color.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chestnut_(color)
Mahogany is the Red Gene, which is one thing I've been also referring too.In many other situations, I think "chestnut" is used to mean various shades of red-brown, and "mahogany" is used to mean various dark shades of brown (often not as red), although of course it's not entirely consistent.
Within a given book (SOP), definitely go with the definitions that are in that book.
But when I look up photos of chesnuts online, most of them are lighter than your nut. So you might have an actual chesnut that is not "chestnut" in color.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chestnut_(color)
Nice pictures. Looks like the pullets didn’t want to pose, though.Here's the peeps at 6 weeks old.
View attachment 2723062View attachment 2723064View attachment 2723066View attachment 2723068
I know that, and I just realized what I go wrong:Mahogany is the Red Gene, which is one thing I've been also referring too.