- Thread starter
- #1,041
It depends. I shot in jpeg for a long time and a couple of my best images are jpegs. But you have a limited latitude for post processing when you shoot in jpeg. When I started, I didn't process anything. Now I shoot in raw and process every image in lightroom. But I'm not processing that many images. I may take 3-500 images in a morning, but I'll only end up with 3 or 4 that I really like. When you shoot in raw you have to process your image. Jpegs are preprocessed in the camera.Am I being silly if I'm not taking photos in RAW and processing them on a program like lightroom after?? Seems like a long process to take a photo but everywhere I go people seem to be telling me to take photos in RAW.
The biggest thing I use lightroom for is pulling down highlights that are too bright (overexposed) and bringing up shadows. I also add very subtle vignettes to key in on the focal point of the image and I adjust the white balance.
Learning to edit is one of the most beneficial tips to improve the quality of your images, it does take some time though. Obviously, you have to do everything else right first to get a good image, but a good edit can take your image to the next level.
Here's an example of what I do and how editing can benefit an image. This is a raw image straight out of the camera....
This is same image cropped and rotated to make him more level.... but if you notice, his butt is bright and his face is dark.
This is my final edited image. On the original image his back was very bright and his face was dark. So I dodged (darkened) his back, burned (brightened) his face. I also added a vignette that darkened the background and helps to draw your focus to his face.
Here's another example of some subtle changes that improved an image..... this is a raw image straight out of the camera.
This is it cropped and unedited...
This is my final edit. I didn't make any big changes but I lowered the highlights a little, increased the shadows (brightened the underside of the wings), and I increased the brightness of the eye. Small changes but the help improve the image.
I also make small adjustments to sharpening, texture, vibrance, etc. Jpegs apply a lot of things automatically but in raw I get to apply them in the amounts that I prefer. Like sharpening for instance. Jpegs apply 40 to sharpening over the entire image. In raw I apply 40-50 but I only sharpen areas of the image that I want sharpened. You have more control of the final image when you shoot in raw.
You can still edit jpegs in lightroom too, I have done that a lot. The benefit of Jpegs is they look better than raw photos straight out of the camera.
One thing that is important to know is you cannot edit a poorly shot image and expect it to be great. You have to get the fundamentals down first and get close to your subject, shoot in good light, at a good angle, and with proper camera settings. That's what I would focus on first. Then when you start consistently taking technically sound images, editing will help elevate them to the next level.... my $.02
Last edited: