Quote:
Interesting. I had no idea. Sounds to me like that could do a LOT more good than letting the business fail/cut jobs and just handing checks out with no products produced.
Of course, some might say that that's what we've done with the bailouts... and in a way I can sorta see the point, money going to a private business and all. The difference is that in a bailout they can spend as they wish and still cut jobs... whereas with this system the money KEEPS jobs, not at 100% but still something, people are still EARNING (which if nothing else is huge in the attitude dept), and product is still being made.... sales still being made... tax revenue still coming in...
Yeah, I'd be open to an idea like this, at least willing to listen, if I was in office and someone proposed it.
Interesting. I had no idea. Sounds to me like that could do a LOT more good than letting the business fail/cut jobs and just handing checks out with no products produced.
Of course, some might say that that's what we've done with the bailouts... and in a way I can sorta see the point, money going to a private business and all. The difference is that in a bailout they can spend as they wish and still cut jobs... whereas with this system the money KEEPS jobs, not at 100% but still something, people are still EARNING (which if nothing else is huge in the attitude dept), and product is still being made.... sales still being made... tax revenue still coming in...
Yeah, I'd be open to an idea like this, at least willing to listen, if I was in office and someone proposed it.