I am curious how the ameraucana was determined not to have blue egg genes. You state you bred the Ameraucana ( presumable a rooster) to a Marans hen then an hour and a half later post that the Ameraucana did not have the blue egg gene.
Suspicion #1: you don't have an Ameraucana, you have an easter egger rooster.
Suspicion #2: it is highly unlikely your pullet laid an egg in that specific hour and a half so this story has an unknown source to prove the genetics.
Suspicion #3: you don't quite understand how the blue egg gene on chromosome 1 works.
For the Marans question about sex linked genes, look up W/Z sex determination chromosomes for birds. Males are homogametic for ZZ while females have ZW. The hen determines which sex the chick will hatch as by providing either a Z or W chromosome. Since some of the genes for porphyrin production are on the sex chromosomes, it is possible to double the likely hood of a good transmission to offspring by using a rooster that is homozygous for the trait.
Delving just a little deeper into the genetics, the porphyrin coating is deposited on the egg after the eggshell has formed by specialized secretory cells in the duct down which the egg travels. More secretory cells gives a darker egg. Marans have been selected for more secretory cells along with having them along more of the reproductive duct.
It is also important to understand that porphyrin production is not just a gene. It is a "biopath" meaning several genes work in concert to produce the coating on eggs. Turn on or off one of those genes and the result could be lighter eggs or even plain white eggs. There is also a "zinc white" gene that affects the porphyrin biopath. In your case, zinc white must be avoided as it can severely limit porphryin production.