The reason an SKS/ AK is so realiable is because they are so loose fitting, sand and mud in the bolt isn't a major factor because it doesn't matter. The problem the OP posted about in the first M-16 was because of.... the change in the powder from the prototype to the issue weapon, the lack of a chrome lined chamber, lack of training in the cleaning of the weapon. Once those were corrected (at the loss of who knows how many lives) the M-16 became one of the top assult rifles.
I would buy a ruger mini 14 in either 5.56 or in 7.62x 39 if you don't care that much about accuracy. The action of the mini 14 is based in the M-14. I have one in 5.56 but don't shoot it much because of the accuracy. My plinker is a Colt match HBAR
A US made reliable "long gun" is the M1-A , 7.62x51 AKA .308, google Springfield Armory. When I was going thru jungle warfare school an old crusty Marine Gunny threw an M-16 in a mud hole and jumped up and down on it. Pulling it out and trying to fire it full auto it would shoot one round only, that same thing was done to an M-14 and it shot a full 30 round mag full auto without a hicup. On the rifle team we shot the M-14 at 1000 yards that speaks for it's accuracy.
Steve
I would buy a ruger mini 14 in either 5.56 or in 7.62x 39 if you don't care that much about accuracy. The action of the mini 14 is based in the M-14. I have one in 5.56 but don't shoot it much because of the accuracy. My plinker is a Colt match HBAR
A US made reliable "long gun" is the M1-A , 7.62x51 AKA .308, google Springfield Armory. When I was going thru jungle warfare school an old crusty Marine Gunny threw an M-16 in a mud hole and jumped up and down on it. Pulling it out and trying to fire it full auto it would shoot one round only, that same thing was done to an M-14 and it shot a full 30 round mag full auto without a hicup. On the rifle team we shot the M-14 at 1000 yards that speaks for it's accuracy.
Steve
Last edited: