i am sentimental about the sop..i think the thing that people are trying to say and its not being conveyed well..is look hard in some of the birds in the standard orp and the orpington written by guys who were winning the big shows in the day of the sop...we keep posting the pages..the big clevenger birds also..then look with an objective eye at a lot of birds in exhibition today...something going wrong..few if any almost none look like those clevenger birds..thou a lot of people in thier minds think they do, they do not..far removed.. well how do we bring that back? maybe im not conveying it well either..but somewhere between here and there, something changed, birds more streamline..maybe its because none of those old birds around to compare thou the bloodlines are in there..creativly couldnt the english type and not all of them correct either improve ? hope vickie doesnt mind if i use her as an example, look the bird in her avatar, nice, no backward wedge shape..so lot of us think between the 2 worlds lies the perfect bird..maybe you have a suggestion how to maybe coax that out of the existing american birds..we think maybe a touch of the english might be an answer..your opinion is valued.I don't think people here realize that ideas on this site do not reflect the sentiments of the exhibition poultry people in general. It is easy to suggest these things online, but it is another matter to come up with a compelling reason for a change to the SOP.. 100 years without a change is saying something about the Orp description. None of the top breeders in the hey day of Orps ever suggested changes to the SOP and they had really different styles of birds......just as we do now. If you want to breed someting that does not fit the SOP that is your right, but we don't change the SOP to fit one groups type of bird. Everyone wants the Standard to describe the birds they have in their yard......this is nothing new. I can't remember how many times people have tried to change the SOP to fit their birds.
Walt
Last edited: