Me too. Here's another question that may take us back to the one that started this thread. 336White Phoenix posted:
"I'm looking to see who here has the rarest birds or who knows what the rarest chicken is Thanx for any info u can give me"
So my return-to-the-root question would be:
Out of the birds you see as rare - whether the "authorities" of the research agree or not - which ones do you see as most needing the boost of a true resurgence? And why?
We've already had one mentioned. The Naked-Necks have suffered from their rampant popularity. There have been hundreds of naked-neck crosses, so many that most of us don't even know what a "true" Naked-Neck is supposed to look like. Some crosses, like the Show-Girls (Naked-Neck/Silkie cross) have caught on and may well go on to being their own breed. Others, not so much.
The issue is not the new crosses. Those are fun to do as back-yard experiments. The issue is that, in the mad race to create a new breed or just a new look, we may well lose the original. I nearly happened to the Nankin. The only thing that saved them through the last century or so was their small size and super-broody nature. In the days before incubators, the gamekeepers in Europe needed a small chicken to brood bigger clutches of quail and pheasant. The Nankin Bantam was perfect for their needs, so they inadvertently kept the breed true and alive. I, for one, am grateful. I love my little red gems!
It nearly happened to the Olandsk Dwarf and the Russian Orloff, too. And it DID happen to another breed, but I can't remember the name. I recently read an article about a breed in Europe that was down to two roosters, and one of them was sterile! According to the article, the remaining rooster was crossed out to similar hens and the breed was saved. I thought I had bookmarked it, but apparently I missed. If anyone can confirm the comment and identify the article and/or breed, I would be grateful. It's really bugging me!
Okay - I'm done writing my "book." Sometimes it's no fun being a history buff ... words get in the way ...
"I'm looking to see who here has the rarest birds or who knows what the rarest chicken is Thanx for any info u can give me"
So my return-to-the-root question would be:
Out of the birds you see as rare - whether the "authorities" of the research agree or not - which ones do you see as most needing the boost of a true resurgence? And why?
We've already had one mentioned. The Naked-Necks have suffered from their rampant popularity. There have been hundreds of naked-neck crosses, so many that most of us don't even know what a "true" Naked-Neck is supposed to look like. Some crosses, like the Show-Girls (Naked-Neck/Silkie cross) have caught on and may well go on to being their own breed. Others, not so much.
The issue is not the new crosses. Those are fun to do as back-yard experiments. The issue is that, in the mad race to create a new breed or just a new look, we may well lose the original. I nearly happened to the Nankin. The only thing that saved them through the last century or so was their small size and super-broody nature. In the days before incubators, the gamekeepers in Europe needed a small chicken to brood bigger clutches of quail and pheasant. The Nankin Bantam was perfect for their needs, so they inadvertently kept the breed true and alive. I, for one, am grateful. I love my little red gems!
It nearly happened to the Olandsk Dwarf and the Russian Orloff, too. And it DID happen to another breed, but I can't remember the name. I recently read an article about a breed in Europe that was down to two roosters, and one of them was sterile! According to the article, the remaining rooster was crossed out to similar hens and the breed was saved. I thought I had bookmarked it, but apparently I missed. If anyone can confirm the comment and identify the article and/or breed, I would be grateful. It's really bugging me!
Okay - I'm done writing my "book." Sometimes it's no fun being a history buff ... words get in the way ...